Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 584982 - net-p2p/bitcoin-cli-0.13.1, net-p2p/bitcoind-0.13.1 and net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-0.13.1-r1 stabilisation request
Summary: net-p2p/bitcoin-cli-0.13.1, net-p2p/bitcoind-0.13.1 and net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-0....
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Anthony Basile
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-06-04 06:01 UTC by Blacklight Shining
Modified: 2016-12-24 10:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
=dev-libs/libsecp256k1-0.0.0_pre20151118 =dev-libs/univalue-1.0.2 =net-p2p/bitcoin-cli-0.13.1 =net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-0.13.1-r1 =net-p2p/bitcoind-0.13.1
Runtime testing required: ---
kensington: sanity-check+

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Blacklight Shining 2016-06-04 06:01:42 UTC 
Arches: x86, amd64, arm

No open bugs. The changelog isn't available, but there's an ebuild for 0.10.2 in my /usr/portage from three months ago, so I think it's safe to say it's been around for a while. Also, =net-p2p/bitcoind-0.10.2 and =net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-0.10.2 are stable for these arches.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Luke-Jr 2016-06-04 19:15:30 UTC 
Can we just target 0.12.0 for this? I don't see any significant risk, and it's been in the tree over 2 months.
Comment 2 Luke-Jr 2016-07-01 16:18:33 UTC 
...
Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-07-24 12:22:11 UTC 
Feel free then to provide a full list of bitcoin* packages to stabilize and CC arches :)
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2016-09-30 14:37:19 UTC 
Maybe after the delay even 0.13.0 would be a better candidate :/
Comment 5 Blacklight Shining 2016-10-02 14:39:05 UTC 
Well, 0.13.0 has been in the tree for just over a month now, and has no open bugs, so it's eligible for stabilization, right?
Comment 6 Luke-Jr 2016-10-02 21:11:40 UTC 
(In reply to Blacklight Shining from comment #5)
> Well, 0.13.0 has been in the tree for just over a month now, and has no open
> bugs, so it's eligible for stabilization, right?

Yeah. Sounds like someone just needs to get a package list together for Pacho.
Comment 7 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2016-11-21 00:10:13 UTC 
Latest bitcoin-0.13.1-r1 drops an unnecessary REQUIRED_USE for Qt4/5, so stabilisation of this version instead would be much appreciated.
Comment 8 Andreas Sturmlechner gentoo-dev 2016-12-10 16:02:37 UTC 
<blueness> genstorm: do it

So, here's a stabilisation list, as far as I can see:


dev-libs/libsecp256k1-0.0.0_pre20151118
dev-libs/univalue-1.0.2
net-p2p/bitcoin-cli-0.13.1
net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-0.13.1-r1
net-p2p/bitcoind-0.13.1
Comment 9 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-12-19 19:56:47 UTC 
Stable on amd64.
Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-20 09:08:32 UTC 
x86 stable
Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-24 10:26:16 UTC 
arm stable. Closing.