Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 58434 - NEW EBUILD: app-office/sixpack.ebuild
Summary: NEW EBUILD: app-office/sixpack.ebuild
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: TeX project
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sixpack/
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-26 09:38 UTC by Ingo Bormuth
Modified: 2008-04-13 00:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
app-office/sixpack-0.98.ebuild (sixpack-0.98.ebuild,730 bytes, text/plain)
2004-07-26 09:39 UTC, Ingo Bormuth
Details
dev-perl/bp-0.2.98.ebuild (bp-0.2.98.ebuild,592 bytes, text/plain)
2004-07-26 09:40 UTC, Ingo Bormuth
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ingo Bormuth 2004-07-26 09:38:17 UTC
SIXPACK is a free BibTeX and Reference Manager based on perl-bp.

The hack works fine for me - feedback would be appreciated.
Comment 1 Ingo Bormuth 2004-07-26 09:39:41 UTC
Created attachment 36201 [details]
app-office/sixpack-0.98.ebuild
Comment 2 Ingo Bormuth 2004-07-26 09:40:34 UTC
Created attachment 36202 [details]
dev-perl/bp-0.2.98.ebuild
Comment 3 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-10 08:31:55 UTC
Sorry for the delay. I'll look into it this weekend.
Comment 4 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-11-15 00:00:01 UTC
First of all, please make sure LICENSE is correct.
"GPL" is not valid. LICENSE must match one in
/usr/portage/licenses. dev-perl/bp doesn't
even have correct LICENSE file, but "as-is" seems
okay here.

Second, if you are downloading something from
sourceforge, please use SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/sixpack/..."
instead of picking up specific sf mirror. Have a
look at /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartimirrors
for complete list of available mirrors defined by
Portage.

Lastly, http://sourceforge.net/projects/sixpack/
seems to have perl-bp-0.7 and sixpack-2.1,
so what's the correct versioning? If they currently
maintain the programme, I think using their
version number is better than employing the 
original one.
Comment 5 Mathias Weigt 2008-01-31 08:31:47 UTC
I think this bug should be closed WONTFIX because the project is dead (I have looked at the CVS and the the last change was 3 years ago).
Comment 6 Ingo Bormuth 2008-04-13 00:50:34 UTC
Mathias you're right. Years ago I moved to pybliographer.org today I use zotero.org.
Finally closing this bug as WONTFIX.