Bug 583060 – =app-misc/rox-filer-2.11: stabilization request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description cazzantonio 2016-05-15 00:04:16 UTC]

I've been using rox-filer-2.11 since initial commit (march 2015) both on amd64 and x86 with no bugs. Maybe after more than an year it is time to stabilize it?

Thanks

[Comment 1 P Purkayastha 2016-05-15 08:15:44 UTC]

Created attachment 434312 [details]
New ebuild with stabilized amd64 and x86

New ebuild with stabilized amd64 and x86.

[Comment 2 P Purkayastha 2016-05-15 08:18:43 UTC]

I have been using rox daily on amd64 without issues. All the dependencies are also stable on amd64.

@cazzantonio: can you also check that the dependencies are all stable on x86?

Also, attached an ebuild with stable amd64 and x86. I can't test on arm. The only difference are the keywords, as show in the patch below:

--- /usr/portage/app-misc/rox-filer/rox-filer-2.11.ebuild	2015-09-26 10:06:50.862955340 +0800
+++ rox-filer-2.11.ebuild	2016-05-15 16:14:01.110139303 +0800
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@

 LICENSE="GPL-2 LGPL-2"
 SLOT="0"
-KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~x86"
+KEYWORDS="amd64 ~arm x86"
 IUSE=""

 COMMON_DEPEND="dev-lang/perl

[Comment 3 Coacher 2016-05-15 09:52:58 UTC]

(In reply to P Purkayastha from comment #1)
> New ebuild with stabilized amd64 and x86.

This is not how Gentoo stabilization process works.
Please refer to this document: https://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/#moving-from-~arch-to-arch

[Comment 4 cazzantonio 2016-05-15 09:59:55 UTC]

(In reply to P Purkayastha from comment #2)
> 
> @cazzantonio: can you also check that the dependencies are all stable on x86?
> 
Yes, no reported problems for me

[Comment 5 P Purkayastha 2016-05-15 13:42:05 UTC]

@Coach: Thanks for adding the STABLEREQ keyword.

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-06-06 13:34:26 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-06-25 20:16:16 UTC]

x86 stable. Closing.