mailutils and mailx should all provide virtual/mailx, as they are blocking each other anyway. I see that net-mail/mailutils blocks mail-client/mailx and mail-client/nmh, but mail-client/mailx only blocks net-mail/mailutils, and mail-client/nmh doesn't block anything.
> mailutils and mailx should all provide virtual/mailx, before we can create virtual/mailx, we need the following archs add virtual/mailx: mail-client/mailx to their arch profiles: ppc, sparc, alpha, mips, hppa, ia64, amd64, ppc64 # grep KEYWORDS /usr/portage/mail-client/mailx/*.ebuild /usr/portage/mail-client/mailx/mailx-8.1.2.20021129-r2.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~ppc sparc alpha ~mips hppa ia64 amd64" /usr/portage/mail-client/mailx/mailx-8.1.2.20021129-r3.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc ~alpha ~mips hppa ~ia64 ~amd64 ppc64" > I see that net-mail/mailutils blocks mail-client/mailx and mail-client/nmh, > but mail-client/mailx only blocks net-mail/mailutils, > and mail-client/nmh doesn't block anything. net-mail/mailutils blocks mail-client/nmh because mailutils build with MH support. It provides all of the nmh utilities. mail-client/nmh doesn't block net-mail/mailutils because nmh doesn't provide all of the binaries that mailutils offer.
sparc done
hppa done
mips done
ppc done
amd64 done
alpha and ia64 done
ppc64. We are waiting on you :)
ppc64, thanks.
sorry to be pokey .. taken care of on ppc64