58134 – Code listing 2.5: ? : is deprecated in *DEPEND. Use foo? () !foo? () instead

Bug 58134 - Code listing 2.5: ? : is deprecated in *DEPEND. Use foo? () !foo? () instead

Summary: Code listing 2.5: ? : is deprecated in *DEPEND. Use foo? () !foo? () instead

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	[OLD] Docs-developer
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Developers HOWTO (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Docs Team

URL:	http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-h...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2004-07-23 16:58 UTC by Renat Lumpau (RETIRED)
Modified:	2004-07-23 17:53 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Renat Lumpau (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-07-23 16:58:26 UTC

<@Mr_Bones_> squinky86: ? : is deprecated in *DEPEND.  Use foo? () !foo? () instead
19:41 <+rl03> Mr_Bones_: can we perhaps update the docs to reflect that?
19:43 <@Mr_Bones_> I'm sure we can
19:45 <+rl03> Mr_Bones_: specifically: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-howto.xml , code listing 2.5
19:47 <@Mr_Bones_> rl03: let the doc team know
19:47 <+rl03> ok
19:51 <+rl03> Mr_Bones_: why is bug #46005 still open then?
19:51 <+GenBot> rl03: Bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46005 nor, P2, All, dev-portage@gentoo.org, NEW, The ?:
                syntax cannot be deprecated yet
19:52 <@Mr_Bones_> rl03: because the portage team hasn't closed it yet.
19:52 <+rl03> ok, i'll just bug the docs team then

See for instance the bugzilla ebuild
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-www/bugzilla/bugzilla-2.18.0_rc1.ebuild

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2004-07-23 17:53:17 UTC

removed