Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 581022 - dev-qt/qtscript - error: undefined reference to 'cti_vm_throw'
Summary: dev-qt/qtscript - error: undefined reference to 'cti_vm_throw'
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Qt Bug Alias
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 581024 616100 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-04-24 09:41 UTC by Maxim Sheviakov
Modified: 2017-05-14 21:27 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
emerge --info output (info.txt,6.43 KB, text/plain)
2016-04-24 09:41 UTC, Maxim Sheviakov
Details
build.log of qtscript (compressed) (buildlog.txt.bz2,10.48 KB, application/x-bzip2)
2016-04-24 09:42 UTC, Maxim Sheviakov
Details
build.log (qtscript-5.7.1) (qtscript5.7.1.tar.gz,39.90 KB, application/gzip)
2017-04-22 13:50 UTC, Petross404(Petros S)
Details
fix-cti_vm_throw.patch (fix-cti_vm_throw.patch,795 bytes, patch)
2017-05-14 20:35 UTC, Petross404(Petros S)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maxim Sheviakov 2016-04-24 09:41:23 UTC
Hello.

qtscript-5.6.0 doesn't compile because of absent openvg.h file. I'm unsure, but that may be related to Mesa. Maybe a simple patch for that is needed?
Comment 1 Maxim Sheviakov 2016-04-24 09:41:43 UTC
Created attachment 431780 [details]
emerge --info output
Comment 2 Maxim Sheviakov 2016-04-24 09:42:48 UTC
Created attachment 431782 [details]
build.log of qtscript (compressed)
Comment 3 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-04-24 21:24:10 UTC
openvg has nothing to do with this, you're looking at the wrong error.

The actual error line is:
/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtscript-5.6.0/temp/ccC9F0pi.ltrans0.ltrans.o(.text+0x4c): error: undefined reference to 'cti_vm_throw'

However I cannot make sense of your build.log due to '-s' in your MAKEOPTS. Please attach a new build log without '-s'.

Does it build without LTO?
Comment 4 Maxim Sheviakov 2016-04-25 12:40:43 UTC
Well, yeah - stuff compiles without LTO. It's upstream bug, then, as other QT stuff compiles and runs okay with LTO enabled.
Comment 5 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-04-25 14:29:55 UTC
*** Bug 581024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Petross404(Petros S) 2017-04-22 13:49:17 UTC
(In reply to Maxim Sheviakov from comment #4)
> Well, yeah - stuff compiles without LTO. It's upstream bug, then, as other
> QT stuff compiles and runs okay with LTO enabled.

I can confirm that =dev-qt/qtscript-5.7.1 continues to fail with :
error: undefined reference to 'cti_vm_throw'
Comment 7 Petross404(Petros S) 2017-04-22 13:50:30 UTC
Created attachment 470642 [details]
build.log (qtscript-5.7.1)
Comment 8 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-04-23 13:44:07 UTC
*** Bug 616100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Petross404(Petros S) 2017-05-14 20:35:49 UTC
Created attachment 472626 [details, diff]
fix-cti_vm_throw.patch

This fixed the link problem for qtscript-5.7.1
Comment 10 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-05-14 20:38:09 UTC
(In reply to Petross404(Petros S) from comment #9)
> Created attachment 472626 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> fix-cti_vm_throw.patch
> 
> This fixed the link problem for qtscript-5.7.1

is this an upstream patch?
Comment 11 Petross404(Petros S) 2017-05-14 20:43:00 UTC
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #10)
> (In reply to Petross404(Petros S) from comment #9)
> is this an upstream patch?

No, it's just a patch I created after reading comments in various forums.

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56088
http://markmail.org/thread/cgmnxgm3ftjqtxa5

Oh, I forgot to mention that I used bfd. Do you want me to test with gold and report as well?
Comment 12 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2017-05-14 21:17:29 UTC
(In reply to Petross404(Petros S) from comment #11)
> Oh, I forgot to mention that I used bfd. Do you want me to test with gold
> and report as well?

You're most likely already using gold, qt5 uses it by default when available.
I'm more concerned about clang... I don't think it supports __attribute__((used))...
Comment 13 Petross404(Petros S) 2017-05-14 21:27:56 UTC
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #12)
> You're most likely already using gold, qt5 uses it by default when available.
> I'm more concerned about clang... I don't think it supports
> __attribute__((used))...

One step at the time. The ebuild can conditionally apply the patch and fix the issue for the GCC users (I hope it workes for others too). 

As for the Clang users, well upstream must support LTO at some point for all compilers.