There's been about 2 updates since any ebuild rolled out for Cinnamon, the latest one is located here: https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/2.8.8
As of this post we are now a major release behind Cinnamon's upstream, which is currently at Version 3.0.1. https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.1
*** Bug 581504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
3.0.5 now: https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.5
Pacho: i have just bumped ebuild for cinnamon3 and it work normally. maybe you bump cinnamon ebulds ?)
(In reply to cronolio from comment #4) > Pacho: i have just bumped ebuild for cinnamon3 and it work normally. maybe > you bump cinnamon ebulds ?) Uh, seems you just added the build for 2.8.8, I don't see a testing/unstable ebuild for any Cinnamon 3 release just yet. https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.5
(In reply to Alex Acevedo from comment #5) > (In reply to cronolio from comment #4) > > Pacho: i have just bumped ebuild for cinnamon3 and it work normally. maybe > > you bump cinnamon ebulds ?) > > Uh, seems you just added the build for 2.8.8, I don't see a testing/unstable > ebuild for any Cinnamon 3 release just yet. > > https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.5 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Overlay/Local_overlay the only thing that I'm doing it is mv packagename-1 packagename-2; ebuild *.ebuild digest ) and maybe minimal changes into ebuild and now i have cinnamon --version Cinnamon 3.0.5
(In reply to cronolio from comment #6) > (In reply to Alex Acevedo from comment #5) > > (In reply to cronolio from comment #4) > > > Pacho: i have just bumped ebuild for cinnamon3 and it work normally. maybe > > > you bump cinnamon ebulds ?) > > > > Uh, seems you just added the build for 2.8.8, I don't see a testing/unstable > > ebuild for any Cinnamon 3 release just yet. > > > > https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.5 > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Overlay/Local_overlay > the only thing that I'm doing it is > mv packagename-1 packagename-2; ebuild *.ebuild digest ) > and maybe minimal changes into ebuild > > and now i have cinnamon --version > Cinnamon 3.0.5 Eh, if you post your ebuild n' digest from the local overlay as an attachment I think pacho can throw it on the portage tree. Are the dependencies unchanged still?
(In reply to Alex Acevedo from comment #7) > (In reply to cronolio from comment #6) > > (In reply to Alex Acevedo from comment #5) > > > (In reply to cronolio from comment #4) > > > > Pacho: i have just bumped ebuild for cinnamon3 and it work normally. maybe > > > > you bump cinnamon ebulds ?) > > > > > > Uh, seems you just added the build for 2.8.8, I don't see a testing/unstable > > > ebuild for any Cinnamon 3 release just yet. > > > > > > https://github.com/linuxmint/Cinnamon/releases/tag/3.0.5 > > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Overlay/Local_overlay > > the only thing that I'm doing it is > > mv packagename-1 packagename-2; ebuild *.ebuild digest ) > > and maybe minimal changes into ebuild > > > > and now i have cinnamon --version > > Cinnamon 3.0.5 > > Eh, if you post your ebuild n' digest from the local overlay as an > attachment I think pacho can throw it on the portage tree. Are the > dependencies unchanged still? then you should be know) i'm small gentoo user and maybe my changes is wrong
Created attachment 437416 [details, diff] cinnamon-3.0.5.ebuild
Created attachment 437420 [details, diff] cinnamon-control-center-3.0.0.ebuild
Created attachment 437424 [details, diff] cinnamon-desktop-3.0.2.ebuild i'm use openrc and not test it with systemd. maybe need change version of systemd gschema
Created attachment 437426 [details, diff] cinnamon-menus-3.0.2.ebuild just bump it :)
Created attachment 437428 [details, diff] cinnamon-screensaver-3.0.1.ebuild
Created attachment 437430 [details, diff] cinnamon-session-3.0.1.ebuild
Created attachment 437432 [details, diff] cinnamon-settings-daemon-3.0.1.ebuild
Created attachment 437434 [details, diff] cinnamon-translations-3.0.2.ebuild
other packages nothing interesting from me to be bump it. in some place i comment some patch because he not work with >=3.0. maybe because fix from upstream. all it not interesting and bump it will be easy for gentoo guru...
It's more about we lacking time to do this :( (also, the next in my TODO list is to try to finally get Gnome 3.20 in the tree... we are also having a huge delay for that :S)
Pacho: I think i heard something about gtk4 https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2016/06/13/gtk-4-0-is-not-gtk-4/ ;)
hello gnome's team! i see you add new eduild version for cinnamon and it is greath!!! https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=4ee2645d4e63a78eea6f1ab20c0ddd03acfdc2f5 but i think it >=gnome-extra/nemo-2.4 >=gnome-extra/cinnamon-control-center-2.4 >=gnome-extra/cinnamon-screensaver-2.4 should be >=gnome-extra/nemo-3.0 >=gnome-extra/cinnamon-control-center-3.0 >=gnome-extra/cinnamon-screensaver-3.0 and other cinnamon deps because what if user do try to downgrade from 3.0 to 2.8 it will no... Thank you!
Supposedly, upstream configure checks are not so strict, if you are having concrete problems when trying to build it against older version, upstream will need to know also
