Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 57931 - gnome-base/libglade missing dep upon x11-libs/pango
Summary: gnome-base/libglade missing dep upon x11-libs/pango
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-21 20:40 UTC by Ciaran McCreesh
Modified: 2004-07-23 09:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ciaran McCreesh 2004-07-21 20:40:57 UTC 
libglade-2.4.0 fails to build as follows. Emergeing pango fixes it.

checking for   libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.10   atk >= 1.0.0   gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0   glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0... Package pangoxft was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `pangoxft.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'pangoxft', required by 'GDK', not found

configure: error: Library requirements (  libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.10   atk >= 1.0.0   gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0   glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.

!!! ERROR: gnome-base/libglade-2.4.0 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 426, Exitcode 1
!!! econf failed
Comment 1 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-07-23 04:19:09 UTC 
Hmm, something is strange on your system:
libglade depends on gtk+ >= 2.4.0
gtk+ depends on pango

So, this "doesn't happen" and we don't set specific dependencies becase gtk+ is a hard one that blankets the others.

So, I'd presume your system has in some way had packages torn out from below.
Comment 2 Ciaran McCreesh 2004-07-23 09:53:56 UTC 
Ok, looks like I've found yet another depclean bug. Sorry guys...