Created attachment 424284 [details] perl-mozldap-1.5.3.ebuild Hi, My first submission so please bear with me if this is the wrong location / method. We will be submitting an updated 389-ds-base ebuild momentarily, it requires dev-perl/perl-mozldap-1.5.3, which no longer uses mozldap but instead uses openldap so I've attached a suitable ebuild, authored by wibrown@rh to assist with getting this in-tree. This should also resolve 468124 btw. Thanks, Wes
(In reply to Wes from comment #0) > Created attachment 424284 [details] > perl-mozldap-1.5.3.ebuild > > Hi, > > My first submission so please bear with me if this is the wrong location / > method. This is the right place and method. Thank you for working on this. > We will be submitting an updated 389-ds-base ebuild momentarily, it > requires dev-perl/perl-mozldap-1.5.3, which no longer uses mozldap but > instead uses openldap so I've attached a suitable ebuild, authored by > wibrown@rh to assist with getting this in-tree. This should also resolve > 468124 btw. The Perl Project is working on moving all of the Perl modules to using EAPI 6. Please modify the ebuild to use use EAPI 6 instead of 5. Did you use gentoo-perlmod-version.pl to determine the version number? If not, please see: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Perl/perl-herd#Version_numbers_in_Gentoo_perl_ebuilds > Thanks, > Wes No, thank you!
As per IRC discussion, this is not a CPAN module, hence the naming scheme is fine. As for EAPI 6, Perl eclasses have been migrated to EAPI 6 already so I guess it just takes changing EAPI 5 to 6 in the ebuild. I'll do it after merging the PR.
commit 3df3dda (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> Date: Tue Feb 2 12:10:42 2016 +0000 dev-perl/perl-mozldap: EAPI 6. Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26 Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org>
* commit a08d8cb |\ Merge: 49479df 708306d | | Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> | | Date: Tue Feb 2 12:06:40 2016 +0000 | | | | Merge remote-tracking branch 'github/pr/771'. | | | | Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org>
(In reply to Patrice Clement from comment #2) > As per IRC discussion, this is not a CPAN module, hence the naming scheme is > fine. That's wrong. CPAN or not doesnt matter. However, in this case you'll find that the version is correct anyway (in short, versions that contain dots are not changed, CPAN or not).
