Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 569218 - app-admin/hddtemp: new db entry for WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0
Summary: app-admin/hddtemp: new db entry for WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Amadeusz Żołnowski (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-12-22 18:11 UTC by Martin Walch
Modified: 2016-02-28 11:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Walch 2015-12-22 18:11:28 UTC
"WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0"						194 C "Western Digital Blue 1TB SATA3 7200RPM 64MB"


I intended to also add an Intenso 2.5" Solid State Drive SATA III 128GB (article no. 3812430), again with S.M.A.R.T. value ID 194, but at least the drive that I currently hold in hands does not change that value on temperature change, but always reports "30". There is also no other S.M.A.R.T. value that changes when temperature rises or falls. Furthermore the device model just reports as "INTENSO" and nothing more specific. The whole S.M.A.R.T. implementation of that drive looks a bit strange.
Comment 1 Tomáš Mózes 2015-12-22 19:47:49 UTC
If I'm not mistaken, this is done upstream, can you please report it to the maintainers?
Comment 2 Martin Walch 2015-12-22 21:23:30 UTC
From /usr/share/doc/hddtemp-0.3_beta15-r25/README.gentoo:

If your hard drive is not recognized by hddtemp, please consider
submitting your HDD info for inclusion into the Gentoo hddtemp
database by filing a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/
Comment 3 Amadeusz Żołnowski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-01-04 19:09:45 UTC
Martin, you can try some other values, maybe? 190 seems to be popular as well.

WDC has just been added to the db.
Comment 4 Martin Walch 2016-02-28 11:16:39 UTC
(In reply to Amadeusz Żołnowski from comment #3)
> Martin, you can try some other values, maybe? 190 seems to be popular as
> well.

I have looked at all entries. None of them changed with temperature.