Bug 56797 – aMule 2.0.0 rc4 released

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Giacomo Perale 2004-07-12 08:29:24 UTC]

aMule 2.0.0 rc4 released

www.amule.org

ebuild from official forum

[Comment 1 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-12 08:31:16 UTC]

Created attachment 35256 [details]
amule 2.0.0 rc4 ebuild

[Comment 2 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-13 11:48:17 UTC]

it seems that in a few days there will be an hotfix that will fix an important network bug.
Maybe inclusion in portage can wait for this to exit.

[Comment 3 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-14 14:26:00 UTC]

Created attachment 35421 [details]
amule-2.0.0_rc4-r1.ebuild

hotfix released, new ebuild

P.S. some utilities (webserver for example) now require wxBase but the library
isn't in portage, so I can't add the dependency.

[Comment 4 Benjamin Martin 2004-07-14 15:31:15 UTC]

It won't compile against dev-libs/crypto++-5.2. I'll try to fix this ASAP.

[Comment 5 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-14 15:36:47 UTC]

Created attachment 35428 [details]
amule-2.0.0_rc4-r1.ebuild

for the moment =dev-libs/crypto++-5.1-r1

[Comment 6 Benjamin Martin 2004-07-14 16:25:28 UTC]

I've made a patch for the configure script that makes it detect the right kind of headers. Sadly though that crypto++ must have undergone changes that a-mule can't cope with because it still refuses to compile.

[Comment 7 Benjamin Martin 2004-07-14 16:26:43 UTC]

Created attachment 35431 [details, diff]
fixe for the configure script

fixes the configure script to use the right headers style

[Comment 8 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-14 16:54:53 UTC]

I've submitted bug report, I hope the developer will fix this ASAP.
For the moment amule requires crypto++-5.1.

[Comment 9 Mikkel Schubert 2004-07-15 12:43:11 UTC]

To fix compilation with Crypto++ 5.2, apply the following patch. However, please note that I have yet to test if aMule functions correctly with Crypto++ 5.2. Anway, the patch:

--- amule-dev-cvs/src/opcodes.h	2004-07-14 18:27:58.000000000 +0200
+++ amule-crypto//src/opcodes.h	2004-07-15 21:29:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
 // you shouldn't change anything here if you are not really sure, or amule will probaly not work
 #define	MAXFRAGSIZE				1300
 #define	PARTSIZE				9728000
-#define	BLOCKSIZE				184320
+const int	BLOCKSIZE =			184320;
 #define	OP_EDONKEYHEADER			0xE3
 #define	OP_EDONKEYPROT				OP_EDONKEYHEADER
 #define	OP_PACKEDPROT				0xD4

[Comment 10 Benjamin Martin 2004-07-16 04:59:18 UTC]

Using that patch it compiles fine, but still issues errors concerning crypto++. I'll test it later today to see if there are any flaws when running it.

[Comment 11 Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-17 11:20:08 UTC]

*** Bug 57394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 12 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-18 10:36:16 UTC]

referring to bug #57394, it seems that amule CVS now works flawlessy with libcrypto++ 5.2 and a new rc (rc5) will be released soon, maybe today.

[Comment 13 Giacomo Perale 2004-07-18 10:42:38 UTC]

sorry

I mean bug #57442

[Comment 14 Daniel Webert 2004-07-18 16:32:56 UTC]

see bug #57528

rc5 fixes the prob