Bug 561340 – =app-officeext/ooofbtools-2.38 version bump

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Sergey S. Starikoff 2015-09-24 11:16:04 UTC]

Subj.

Ebuild is the same with 2.36.

[Comment 1 Sergey S. Starikoff 2015-09-30 13:23:57 UTC]

New release.
Ebuild the same.
md5: 0e8aa12a7e2d21407dee3e0f2632f7eb  OOoFBTools-2.38.zip

[Comment 2 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2015-10-06 09:00:27 UTC]

repoman full currently yields

  dependency.unknown            8
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.34.ebuild: RDEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.34.ebuild: DEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.35.ebuild: RDEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.35.ebuild: DEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.36.ebuild: RDEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.36.ebuild: DEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.38.ebuild: RDEPEND: app-office/openoffice
   app-officeext/ooofbtools/ooofbtools-2.38.ebuild: DEPEND: app-office/openoffice

I suspect this is sourced from office-ext-r1 eclass. This need rectifying.

[Comment 3 Sergey S. Starikoff 2015-10-06 10:43:59 UTC]

(In reply to Ian Delaney from comment #2)
> I suspect this is sourced from office-ext-r1 eclass. This need rectifying.

/usr/portage/gentoo/profiles/desc/office_implementation.desc for now contains two values:
libreoffice - use the app-office/libreoffice{,-bin} implementation for extensions
openoffice - use the app-office/openoffice{,-bin} implementation for extensions

But for now the only in-tree available implementation of OpenOffice is app-office/openoffice-bin.
So, /usr/portage/gentoo/eclass/office-ext-r1.eclass code:
RDEPEND=""

for i in ${OFFICE_IMPLEMENTATIONS[@]}; do
    IUSE+=" office_implementation_${i}"
    RDEPEND+="
        office_implementation_${i}? (
            || (
                app-office/${i}${OFFICE_REQ_USE}
                app-office/${i}-bin${OFFICE_REQ_USE}
            )
        )
    "
done

points to non-existent package app-office/openoffice.
But this miss should cover all AOO-compatible extensions, not only OOoFBTools.
Am I to open a eclass bug for this issue?

[Comment 4 Sergey S. Starikoff 2015-10-06 10:52:45 UTC]

Created attachment 413872 [details, diff]
ooofbtools-2.38.ebuild.patch

Attaching patch for 2.38 version.
Removed unnecessary eclass dependency duplication.

[Comment 5 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2015-10-08 10:26:37 UTC]

But this miss should cover all AOO-compatible extensions, not only OOoFBTools.
Am I to open a eclass bug for this issue?

YES

[Comment 6 Andreas Sturmlechner 2015-10-13 18:56:04 UTC]

Bumped: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=c0f33275bf5dc8dc216a9a8cc1d11bff9209624e

[Comment 7 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2015-10-14 08:52:38 UTC]

Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
Date:   Sun Oct 11 02:22:04 2015 +0200

    app-officeext/ooofbtools: Version bump, see bug 561340


 Andreas Sturmlechner are you wanting to be added as a co-maintainer?

[Comment 8 Andreas K. Hüttel 2015-10-14 09:56:15 UTC]

(In reply to Ian Delaney from comment #7)
> Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <[e-mail]>
> Date:   Sun Oct 11 02:22:04 2015 +0200
> 
>     app-officeext/ooofbtools: Version bump, see bug 561340
> 
> 
>  Andreas Sturmlechner are you wanting to be added as a co-maintainer?

What he really wants to do is his quizzes.

[Comment 9 Andreas Sturmlechner 2015-10-15 23:02:10 UTC]

Yes, I should probably finish quizzes. ;)

(In reply to Ian Delaney from comment #7)
>  Andreas Sturmlechner are you wanting to be added as a co-maintainer?

No need to, just coming along and picking up a bug.

[Comment 10 Sergey Popov 2015-10-17 09:17:42 UTC]

Closing this as FIXED, version is bumped, eclass problem will be handled in bug #562640