Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 560324 - =media-gfx/librecad-2.0.3: last stable version was removed from the tree
Summary: =media-gfx/librecad-2.0.3: last stable version was removed from the tree
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Sławek Lis (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-09-13 08:52 UTC by Anthony Basile
Modified: 2015-09-13 20:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-13 08:52:53 UTC
commit e694a96fa462af9c8e1bb76bd2ea66e7dc55d7cb removed =media-gfx/librecad-2.0.3 from the tree which had KEYWORDS="amd64 x86".  Now we have only unstable keywording which breaks the tree.  This makes me sad:

yellow librecad # eshowkw 
Keywords for media-gfx/librecad:
      |                                 | u   |  
      | a a   a         n   p r     s   | n   |  
      | l m   r h i m m i   p i s   p   | u s | r
      | p d a m p a 6 i o p c s 3   a x | s l | e
      | h 6 r 6 p 6 8 p s p 6 c 9 s r 8 | e o | p
      | a 4 m 4 a 4 k s 2 c 4 v 0 h c 6 | d t | o
------+---------------------------------+-----+-------
2.0.5 | o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ | # 0 | gentoo
2.0.6 | o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ | #   | gentoo
2.0.7 | o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ | #   | gentoo
2.0.8 | o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ | o   | gentoo
 9999 | o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o | o   | gentoo


Either restore 2.0.3 or pick a version which is ready for stabilization and we'll rapid stabilize it.

@floppym: another instance of where repoman checking git hist for KEYWORD changes would be good to have.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Sławek Lis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-09-13 19:26:35 UTC
That's my bad. I'm not good with git, and lack of some knowledge lead to this.
I've restored latest version and will thrice-check at next commit.
Comment 2 Jouni Kosonen 2015-09-13 20:05:40 UTC
(In reply to Sławek Lis from comment #1)
> That's my bad. I'm not good with git, and lack of some knowledge lead to
> this.
> I've restored latest version and will thrice-check at next commit.

Thanks. Unfortunately commit 3b1b257c broke the manifest for version 2.0.8:

-DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 23469997 SHA256 3f3aff...
+DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 178976 SHA256 fb285c...

The file size 23469997 is correct.
Comment 3 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-13 20:22:12 UTC
(In reply to Jouni Kosonen from comment #2)
> (In reply to Sławek Lis from comment #1)
> > That's my bad. I'm not good with git, and lack of some knowledge lead to
> > this.
> > I've restored latest version and will thrice-check at next commit.
> 
> Thanks. Unfortunately commit 3b1b257c broke the manifest for version 2.0.8:
> 
> -DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 23469997 SHA256 3f3aff...
> +DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 178976 SHA256 fb285c...
> 
> The file size 23469997 is correct.

It did?  I'm not seeing that here.  Can you show me what you're doing to get that?
Comment 4 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-13 20:22:54 UTC
(In reply to Sławek Lis from comment #1)
> That's my bad. I'm not good with git, and lack of some knowledge lead to
> this.
> I've restored latest version and will thrice-check at next commit.

No problem dude.  I think repoman should have warned you.
Comment 5 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2015-09-13 20:27:12 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jouni Kosonen from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Sławek Lis from comment #1)
> > > That's my bad. I'm not good with git, and lack of some knowledge lead to
> > > this.
> > > I've restored latest version and will thrice-check at next commit.
> > 
> > Thanks. Unfortunately commit 3b1b257c broke the manifest for version 2.0.8:
> > 
> > -DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 23469997 SHA256 3f3aff...
> > +DIST librecad-2.0.8.zip 178976 SHA256 fb285c...
> > 
> > The file size 23469997 is correct.
> 
> It did?  I'm not seeing that here.  Can you show me what you're doing to get
> that?

Oh wait!  It did.  Did the upstream .zip file change?  Anyhow, I committed the fix.  Can you test.
Comment 6 Jouni Kosonen 2015-09-13 20:49:22 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #5)
> Oh wait!  It did.  Did the upstream .zip file change?  Anyhow, I committed
> the fix.  Can you test.
Fixed, thanks!