Bug 5585 – Access Violation Error with gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1.ebuild

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Richard D. Jackson 2002-07-25 16:57:10 UTC]

NOTE: This is on a new install of 1.2 with portage upgraded 

Captured error data:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1/work/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0/doc'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
/bin/sh ../mkinstalldirs /usr/share/gnome/html/gdk-pixbuf
mkdir /usr/share/gnome/html/gdk-pixbuf
ACCESS DENIED  mkdir:     /usr/share/gnome/html/gdk-pixbuf
mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/gnome/html/gdk-pixbuf': Permission denied
make[2]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1/work/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0/doc'
make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1/work/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0/doc'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1

!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
!!! Function src_install, Line 4, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)

--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---------------------------
LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1-19465.log"

mkdir:     /usr/share/gnome/html/gdk-pixbuf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!!! emerge aborting on 
/usr/portage/media-libs/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-0.18.0-r1.ebuild .

Will attach the log file as well

[Comment 1 Richard D. Jackson 2002-07-25 16:58:33 UTC]

Created attachment 2591 [details]
Log of sandbox viloation

[Comment 2 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2002-07-25 21:04:57 UTC]

when did you emerge rsync last, because this problem was fixed about 2 days ago..

[Comment 3 Richard D. Jackson 2002-07-26 00:40:11 UTC]

You mean I just spent the last few hours fixing this for nothing! 
Well I should say I tried to fix it as the emerge just blew up again :) 

I will rsync right now and try again and report back...

Oh if anyone is waching this I did create a patch to mkinstalldirs that will
semi deterime if sandbox path was passed to it if not it modifies the path so it
points into the sandbox verses the real system.

[Comment 4 Richard D. Jackson 2002-07-26 00:44:44 UTC]

Yes that did it. But a question why wasn't the ebuild rev'ed?

[Comment 5 Richard D. Jackson 2002-07-26 00:46:08 UTC]

This should now be marked as fixed....