Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 55685 - Ebuild request: net-snmpj
Summary: Ebuild request: net-snmpj
Status: RESOLVED LATER
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-30 08:42 UTC by Benjamin Collins
Modified: 2006-10-08 08:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Benjamin Collins 2004-06-30 08:42:20 UTC
I would like to see java support added as a use flag to the net-snmp ebuild so that when USE="java", building net-snmp would also install net-snmpj.

It would also be satisfactory to me if net-snmpj was added as a separate ebuild, but ideally, it should be installed as part of the net-snmp ebuild, dependent on USE flags.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.



Expected Results:  
java use flag added to net-snmp
Comment 1 Eldad Zack (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-30 13:23:43 UTC
That's an altogether differnet package.
http://netsnmpj.sourceforge.net/

Comment 2 Jon Hood (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-07-02 20:43:21 UTC
What could (and probably should) be done here is for net-snmp to RDEPEND on net-snmpj if the java use flag is set. If someone can do the ebuilds, I'm sure eldad or I will be able to get to it :). Who knows, by the time I finish typing this, eldad may be done....
Comment 3 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-01 00:59:22 UTC
i see no activity upstream for a year.

resolved: won't fix?
Comment 4 Jonathan Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-01 19:54:04 UTC
the gods in #gentoo-netmon have spoken

upstream being inactive/dead is apparently not a reason to "resolve: won't fix" things, so i suppose i will get my lazy self over there and write an ebuild for it.
Comment 5 Jeff Davidson 2005-05-07 10:48:24 UTC
On a cursory glance, the only upstream distributions are binary only (0.2.5-beta explicitly says this, while a look in 0.2.1 appears to also be binary, especially the .so file within the linux-386 subdirectory of the tarball).

The source code reference on the homepage refers to the SF CVS page, which means this would have to be a CVS ebuild.  Not sure what the herd wants to do with it.

-Jeff
Comment 6 Markus Ullmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-08 08:04:32 UTC
Feel free to reopen it when you have an ebuild