Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 55215 - format string vuln. in GNU gnats
Summary: format string vuln. in GNU gnats
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-26 00:08 UTC by Dan Margolis (RETIRED)
Modified: 2004-06-28 08:34 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dan Margolis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-26 00:08:21 UTC
yanked from bugtraq (no link on securityfocus.com yet):

Zone-h Security Advisory 
Date of discovery : 21 june 2004
Date of release : 24 june 2004
Bug found by Khan Shirani
<shirani@zone-h.org>
http://www.zone-h.org

---------------------------------------
Software : GNU Gnats 4.00
Bugs : formats string bug(s)
Risk : low/medium
Platform : *nix
---------------------------------------

Vulnerability:
==============

A format string bug has been discovered in the Gnats package which 
could *possibly* be exploited to execute arbitrary commands.


vulnerable code:
================


----------------------
gnats-4.0\gnats\misc.c

#ifdef HAVE_SYSLOG_H
case SYSLOG:
syslog (severity, buf);
break;
#endif
----------------------


Vendor Notice:
==============

The Gnats team has been notified of the discoveries via <bug-gnats@gnu.org>
No patch is available at this time


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-28 01:56:15 UTC
The app-xemacs/gnats package we have in portage (an xemacs extension in Lisp, version 1.15) is not the same as the vulnerable GNU Gnats (written in C, version 4.0).

So I don't think we are vulnerable. Krispy : please confirm and close as INVALID if you agree.
Comment 2 Dan Margolis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-28 08:34:10 UTC
Whoops. Good catch.