Raggle can be version bumped to 0.3.1, which works flawlessly. I'm not attaching an ebuild, as renaming the old one is enough, but I'm wondering if this shouldn't use ruby.eclass?
As I mentioned in my last post, I always thought that being a Ruby app, raggle should use ruby.eclass. So, here it is, an ebuild for raggle-0.3.1, finally using the eclass. As a positive side-effect it made me fix a little annoyance in ruby.eclass itself, which Mamoru-san was kind enough to submit already. I also know that the README states it also works with Ruby 1.6.8, so USE_RUBY probably could be set to "any". But as I have only 1.8 installed, I won't test it, and I'm not going to submit something I haven't tried myself. :-) Enough talking, attaching the ebuild and the needed patch to the Makefile.
Created attachment 34225 [details] Ebuild for raggle, using ruby.eclass
Created attachment 34226 [details, diff] Patch to raggles Makefile
Added to CVS. DESTDIR="${D}" in your patch should have been DESTDIR="${D}/usr" (see file hierarcy you got; Gentoo follows FHS), but it's okay... I fixed it.
