Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 545878 - app-office/libreoffice-9999 tries to pull from outdated URL
Summary: app-office/libreoffice-9999 tries to pull from outdated URL
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Office Team
URL: http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/li...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-04-07 19:25 UTC by Bob Wya
Modified: 2015-04-11 20:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bob Wya 2015-04-07 19:25:39 UTC
The Libreoffice git repositories have moved from:
EGIT_REPO_URI="git://anongit.freedesktop.org/${PN}/${mod}"

to:
EGIT_REPO_URI="git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/${PN}/${mod}.git"

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to build app-office/libreoffice-9999 from current main Gentoo Portage tree

Actual Results:  
Build Fails 
* ERROR: app-office/libreoffice-9999::gentoo failed (unpack phase):
 *   Unable to find a matching branch for remote HEAD (e724553b22f7b70ebdc466921d2f3853a30d142d)
 * Call stack:
 *     ebuild.sh, line   93:  Called src_unpack
 *   environment, line 8034:  Called git-r3_src_unpack
 *   environment, line 4206:  Called git-r3_src_fetch
 *   environment, line 4200:  Called git-r3_fetch
 *   environment, line 4102:  Called _git-r3_find_head 'refs/git-r3/HEAD'
 *   environment, line 1277:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *           die "Unable to find a matching branch for remote HEAD (${head_hash})";


Expected Results:  
Clean build without errors

I've a copy of a ebuild for app-office/libreoffice-9999 that builds cleanly
(in my Overlay "bobwya")
Comment 1 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2015-04-07 20:20:08 UTC
Works fine here. Is there any announcement that the URL will move?
Comment 2 Bob Wya 2015-04-08 08:59:32 UTC
I think that was just a flaky DNS issue at my end - y/day :-) Sorry I didn't double check this! Just mark this as invalid...
Comment 3 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2015-04-11 20:36:15 UTC
Thanks!