Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 545870 - dev-util/cmake-3.2.2 stable request
Summary: dev-util/cmake-3.2.2 stable request
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 539126 551320
Blocks: python-3.4-stable
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2015-04-07 18:16 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2015-09-30 14:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-04-07 18:16:24 UTC
As I read in its changelog, it's needed for python-3.4

Thanks
Comment 1 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2015-04-08 10:54:23 UTC
How soon is this needed? If it's not urgent I'd be keen to wait a little bit longer and target a newer version.
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-04-08 20:34:21 UTC
Well... looking to the other pending bugs blocking the parent one I guess you can wait a bit still if needed :)
Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-05-12 14:27:43 UTC
Looks like this is now the last one pending to CC arches :/
Comment 4 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2015-05-12 18:44:16 UTC
3.2.1 has been in testing for just over a month now. A few issues have appeared: bug #532426, bug #546516 (affecting only an unstable package), and bug #548488 (patch provided). Current stable is just over a year old.

@kde, any other opinions on how to proceed? I'm inclined to CC archs.
Comment 5 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2015-05-28 18:47:55 UTC
3.2.2 solves a few regressions. Let's CC arch teams in about a week when the 30 days is up.
Comment 6 Steev Klimaszewski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-06-05 18:08:13 UTC
I don't think arm64 is considered a stable arch yet.  tgall or dlan can chime in, I believe they both have boards and are working on it.  I'm still trying to find the free time to work on getting mine set up.
Comment 7 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2015-06-05 18:12:49 UTC
(In reply to Steev Klimaszewski from comment #6)
> I don't think arm64 is considered a stable arch yet.  tgall or dlan can
> chime in, I believe they both have boards and are working on it.  I'm still
> trying to find the free time to work on getting mine set up.

It's up to you guys of course, but it's already been stable since bug #517016.
Comment 8 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-06-05 18:18:05 UTC
(In reply to Michael Palimaka (kensington) from comment #7)
[...]
> It's up to you guys of course, but it's already been stable since bug
> #517016.

In general, I have seen they are doing like sh/s390... : they simply move things to stable on their own , most of the times apart of bug reports ;)
Comment 9 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-06-12 16:42:40 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-06-16 04:47:48 UTC
Stable for HPPA PPC64.
Comment 11 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2015-06-16 12:22:43 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 12 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-07-15 19:19:35 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 13 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-07-23 20:05:14 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 14 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2015-08-02 09:18:41 UTC
sparc stable
Comment 15 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2015-08-21 16:43:35 UTC
arm stable
Comment 16 Scott Goedeke 2015-08-25 01:29:46 UTC
No longer in the stable branch for ppc - why?

ref:  https://packages.gentoo.org/category/dev-util

Latest ebuild installs 2.8.12.2-r1, deletes 3.2.2
Comment 17 Johannes Huber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-08-25 07:08:22 UTC
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #13)
> ppc stable

Do you forgot to mark it stable or was the comment placed in the wrong bug?
Comment 18 Michael Palimaka (kensington) gentoo-dev 2015-09-30 14:25:57 UTC
Continuing in bug #561620.