Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 53948 - dbjdns ipv6 -- test21 version of the patch available
Summary: dbjdns ipv6 -- test21 version of the patch available
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED)
URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=djbdn...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-14 23:19 UTC by Georgi Georgiev
Modified: 2004-06-23 14:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
djbdns-1.05-r12.patch (djb.patch,1.88 KB, patch)
2004-06-14 23:21 UTC, Georgi Georgiev
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-14 23:19:15 UTC
A new version of the ipv6 patch from fefe.de is available. The new version obsoletes the ipv6arpa patch, as it creates both entries. It also includes the errno patch, so minor tweaking of the ebuild is needed.
Comment 1 Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-14 23:21:11 UTC
Created attachment 33287 [details, diff]
djbdns-1.05-r12.patch

- Update the ipv6 patch to test21
- Remove the obsolete ipv6arpa use flag and patch
- Rearrange patches to apply properly
Comment 2 Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-16 22:32:48 UTC
Please provide a diff of a new ebuild that uses this patch.
Also, make the ebuild fetch from an official source. We do not want to put patches directly into the portage tree unless we have no choice. The reason for this is bloat. The portage tree is already extremely large and growing.
Comment 3 Georgi Georgiev 2004-06-16 22:38:22 UTC
Huh, did you read the patch I attached?

Ah, probably the name is misleading or you simply didn't see it. It is a patch for the djbdns-1.05-r12.ebuild and judging by your comment -- you'll like it.
Comment 4 Jared H. Hudson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-23 14:46:35 UTC
Thanks! Sorry I didn't read the patch carefully enough. It was perfect. I've added this as -r13 and marked -r12 as stable for x86