Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 536322 - net-misc/tlsdate-0.0.6 - add net-libs/polarssl-1.3 support
Summary: net-misc/tlsdate-0.0.6 - add net-libs/polarssl-1.3 support
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: SpanKY
URL: https://github.com/ioerror/tlsdate/is...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-01-11 15:49 UTC by René Rhéaume
Modified: 2016-04-03 01:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
tlsdate-0.0.6-polarssl13.patch (tlsdate-0.0.6-polarssl13.patch,735 bytes, patch)
2015-01-11 15:50 UTC, René Rhéaume
Details | Diff
tlsdate-0.0.6.ebuild.patch (tlsdate-0.0.6.ebuild.patch,725 bytes, patch)
2015-01-11 15:55 UTC, René Rhéaume
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description René Rhéaume 2015-01-11 15:49:36 UTC
tlsdate 0.0.6 (and possibly later versions) supports only PolarSSL 1.2.x, which is not in Gentoo tree. The following patch adds supports for PolarSSL 1.3.x , the series in the tree.



Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge -1 polarssl
2. emerge tlsdate
Actual Results:  
emake failed (build compile phase)

Expected Results:  
tlsdate installed on system
Comment 1 René Rhéaume 2015-01-11 15:50:57 UTC
Created attachment 393696 [details, diff]
tlsdate-0.0.6-polarssl13.patch

Patch adding support for PolarSSL 1.3.x to tlsdate 0.0.6. Not tested for later versions of tlsdate, but might work.
Comment 2 René Rhéaume 2015-01-11 15:55:11 UTC
Created attachment 393698 [details, diff]
tlsdate-0.0.6.ebuild.patch

Ebuild patch

Note that PolarSSL is an automagic dependency, which is why I put emerge -1 polarssl first in the steps to reproduce.
Comment 3 Hanno Böck gentoo-dev 2015-01-28 16:41:12 UTC
I already reported the polarssl issue upstream. The current tlsdate ebuild just disables polarssl support and defaults to openssl (and I'll try to get this stabilized soon).

Given that polarssl currently has an open remote code execution issue for which upstream has not released a fixed version I'm inclined to think we should just stay with openssl. I don't see any urgent need to support polarssl.
Comment 4 René Rhéaume 2015-05-23 13:33:14 UTC
You may want to check bug #549662
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2016-04-03 01:00:09 UTC
i would prefer to be lazy