Created attachment 393388 [details] ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild Upstream has released 2.10.0 I have attached a new ebuild for a version bump. Set EAPI to 5 No other changes to the ebuild where required. I have also removed the ~ mask for amd64. I can't see any reason this can't go stable? * REPOMAN checks pass * Built and tested the ebuild.
Comment on attachment 393388 [details] ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild >inherit base autotools Nothing you use from base.eclass is an improvement here. >KEYWORDS="amd64 ppc x86" You should drop all keywords to ~arch. >DOCS=( "AUTHORS" "NEWS" "README" "ChangeLog" ) > >src_prepare() { > base_src_prepare > eautoreconf >} > >src_configure() { > local myopts="$(use_with tcpd tcp-wrappers) --with-uucp-locking" > econf ${myopts} || die "econf failed" econf die()s on its own. The local variable is not needed at all. The original one-liner was more compact and better legible. >src_install () { > base_src_install The default src_install() is fine here, so "default" in the 2.9.1 ebuild did everything you needed. > insinto /etc > newins ${PN}.conf ${PN}.conf.dist > newinitd "${FILESDIR}/${PN}.initd" ${PN} > newconfd "${FILESDIR}/${PN}.confd" ${PN} You removed two helpful empty lines that distinguished clearly between the normal src_install, the extra file that goes into /etc and the openrc scripts.
(In reply to Brendan Horan from comment #0) > No other changes to the ebuild where required. I beg your pardon? > I have also removed the ~ mask for amd64. > I can't see any reason this can't go stable? Because we have a general rule about waiting 30 days to see what goes wrong (where people can find reasons why it shouldn't go stable as is). Straight-to-stable is reserved for extreme cases.
Wow I am sorry that ebuild is garbage. I don't know what happened there. The only thing that should of changed was EAPI and the version. Honestly nothing else should of changed :) I will fix this and re upload the correct ebuild, sorry about that. Noted on the ~arch keywords.
Created attachment 393452 [details] ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild Correct ebuild file attached. So sorry for the incorrect one yesterday.
Only the version has changed.. :) I hope
Is the new ebuild OK? or do you need me fix anything else ? Thanks
Comment on attachment 393452 [details] ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild --- ser2net-2.9.1.ebuild +++ ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Copyright 1999-2014 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/ser2net/ser2net-2.9.1.ebuild,v 1.1 2014/04/04 13:17:20 tomwij Exp $ +# $Header: $ EAPI=5 No changes.
so just to be clear, you want EAPI=5 and the filename to be changed, nothing else.
I believe so yes. Thanks.
+*ser2net-2.10.0 (03 Feb 2015) + + 03 Feb 2015; Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> +ser2net-2.10.0.ebuild: + version bump (bug #535866)
