Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 534224 - sys-apps/man-db: needs package [app-text/po4a-0.45-rX] as dependancy
Summary: sys-apps/man-db: needs package [app-text/po4a-0.45-rX] as dependancy
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-01-01 18:13 UTC by Ron
Modified: 2015-04-03 07:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ron 2015-01-01 18:13:06 UTC
It appears that previous versions of po4a (pre po4a-0.45) are incompatible. I had a system with po4a-0.43 installed and the ebuilds for man-db (2.6.6, 2.6.7 and 2.7.1) all failed. I updated po4a to the current version (po4a-0.45-r2) and ebuild for man-db-2.7.1 completed successfully. I am entering this report in case someone else runs into the same problem.
Comment 1 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-01-01 18:37:01 UTC
I wonder if we really need to do any action here as app-text/po4a-0.45 is the only version being in portage since October 2014.
Comment 2 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2015-01-11 17:05:07 UTC
(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #1)
> I wonder if we really need to do any action here as app-text/po4a-0.45 is
> the only version being in portage since October 2014.

<QA hat>
As man-db is a part of base-system, i think that extra version clause in dependency on po4a would not hurt anyone but may help those, who upgrades rarely
</QA hat>
Comment 3 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2015-01-13 14:31:12 UTC
+  13 Jan 2015; Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> man-db-2.6.6.ebuild,
+  man-db-2.6.7.1.ebuild, man-db-2.7.1.ebuild:
+  Fixed dependency on app-text/po4a as per bug #534224.
+