Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 53212 - mcvs version bump
Summary: mcvs version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-07 06:02 UTC by Hans Meine
Modified: 2004-06-08 09:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
mcvs-1.0.13 ebuild (mcvs-1.0.13.ebuild,762 bytes, text/plain)
2004-06-07 06:24 UTC, Luke Macken (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hans Meine 2004-06-07 06:02:44 UTC
dev-util/mcvs is three versions behind (1.0.10 instead of 1.0.13).

At the time of writing this bug report, the only change to the ebuild's contents is to set DEB_PV=2 (instead of =3), this depends on what's available at http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mcvs/

Obviously, the current file from that site should be also made available through Gentoo's distfiles repository (as done in the older ebuild), since they don't offer old versions.
Comment 1 Luke Macken (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-07 06:24:38 UTC
Created attachment 32854 [details]
mcvs-1.0.13 ebuild

New ebuild for mcvs-1.0.13 containing user specified changes.  Also had to fix
the doman line to point to correct man page.
Comment 2 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-08 00:45:49 UTC
committed. had to patch the source, since it does not build with clisp-2.33.1 out of the box. thanks for the report.
Comment 3 Hans Meine 2004-06-08 02:11:52 UTC
Hmm, that's strange, I also have clisp-2.33.1 (which was freshly installed as a dep for mcvs), and I did not need any patch.

But the real question is: Does this package need the ~x86 keyword? I don't know Gentoo's policy, but this program seems to be really stable, and there's no separate version marked as stable anyhow.
Comment 4 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-08 09:11:48 UTC
Is it possible your mcvs was linked with clisp-2.33?  Looking in mcvs's source, it tries to make a real number out of clisp's version number at read time to form a conditional compilation feature.  It will fail for a clisp version number with two periods in it (eg. 2.33.1).

Since I didn't encounter any problems when testing mcvs and you say that it is stable, I will mark the ebuild as stable now.
Comment 5 Hans Meine 2004-06-08 09:16:35 UTC
Strange. I did compile mcvs with clisp-2.33.1 (I did not have it installed before) without any problems. But that's not important as long as your trivial patch works for everyone, which it really should.