Please remove the "selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-* )" dependency in the DEPEND variable (not RDEPEND). Take this into account with your next package bump - if after 6 months there have been no need for other package upgrades, we will be bumping the package(s) ourselves with just this change. For more information, see our tracker Bug #527698 [1]. The requested change will be posted as a separate comment/patch. Note that if the package also depends on libselinux, libselinux itself should still remain in DEPEND and RDEPEND. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527698 Reproducible: Always
Index: ntp-4.2.6_p5-r11.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/ntp/ntp-4.2.6_p5-r11.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -B -r1.1 ntp-4.2.6_p5-r11.ebuild --- ntp-4.2.6_p5-r11.ebuild 12 Oct 2014 09:19:24 -0000 1.1 +++ ntp-4.2.6_p5-r11.ebuild 1 Nov 2014 11:37:11 -0000 @@ -24,11 +24,12 @@ !openntpd? ( !net-misc/openntpd ) snmp? ( net-analyzer/net-snmp ) ssl? ( dev-libs/openssl ) - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-ntp ) parse-clocks? ( net-misc/pps-tools )" RDEPEND="${DEPEND} vim-syntax? ( app-vim/ntp-syntax )" -PDEPEND="openntpd? ( net-misc/openntpd )" +PDEPEND="openntpd? ( net-misc/openntpd ) + selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-ntp ) +" S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
After checking with a few colleague developers it seems that this change does not need a revision bump after all. As such, I will make the necessary changes to the packages myself. My apologies for the noise.
