Please remove the "selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-* )" dependency in the DEPEND variable (not RDEPEND). Take this into account with your next package bump - if after 6 months there have been no need for other package upgrades, we will be bumping the package(s) ourselves with just this change. For more information, see our tracker Bug #527698 [1]. The requested change will be posted as a separate comment/patch. Note that if the package also depends on libselinux, libselinux itself should still remain in DEPEND and RDEPEND. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527698 Reproducible: Always
Index: exim-4.84.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/mail-mta/exim/exim-4.84.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -B -r1.12 exim-4.84.ebuild --- exim-4.84.ebuild 18 Oct 2014 14:09:33 -0000 1.12 +++ exim-4.84.ebuild 1 Nov 2014 10:44:29 -0000 @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ postgres? ( dev-db/postgresql-base ) sasl? ( >=dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-2.1.26-r2 ) redis? ( dev-libs/hiredis ) - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-exim ) spf? ( >=mail-filter/libspf2-1.2.5-r1 ) dmarc? ( mail-filter/opendmarc ) srs? ( mail-filter/libsrs_alt ) @@ -68,6 +67,7 @@ !>=mail-mta/ssmtp-2.64-r2[mta] !net-mail/mailwrapper >=net-mail/mailbase-0.00-r5 + selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-exim ) virtual/logger dcc? ( mail-filter/dcc ) "
@swift: just do it (tm). I'll do it when you don't when I have the time.
After checking with a few colleague developers it seems that this change does not need a revision bump after all. As such, I will make the necessary changes to the packages myself. My apologies for the noise.
