mozilla is THE open source browser used by most people. macromedia itself says: Macromedia Flash Player Download Center Linux Browser: Mozilla and Mozilla compatible isn't the "mozilla-flash" (or similar) name better now? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
I think it's called "netscape"-flash because the plugin is intended for all browsers which use Netscape-style plugins, including Netscape proper, Mozilla, Firefox, Opera and perhaps others.
I don't think there is any real reason to change this at this point. Name changes for no real reason just put instability in the tree. Thanks for the suggestion though.
<flame> < dont read> net-www/macromedia-flash sounds good. I you think twice, netscape-flash makes no sense (at least for me) but well, I prefer the philosophy of "if it works, leave it" i dont care a lot about names. > there is any real reason to change this at this point. Maybe some day it will exist some real reason or a point to change weird names in packages. I can not figure out a real reason. (But somwhere inside me says, yea a name change sound good) > Name changes for no real reason just put instability in the tree I think portage have all the funcionality for /var/db moves et. al but I don't understand wich kind of instability :-S </dont read> I dont know why I found this bug, :P </flame>
