PGF and TikZ 3.0.0 has been long enough in the tree unstable. There are no open gentoo bugs for pgf-3.0.0. I also have just spent ~ 1h reading the (current) pgfmanual , wondering why $stuff doesn't work until I noticed that the latest pgf stable in gentoo is 2.10. Appears there are some big (API) changes in 3.0, as it's a new major release. Reproducible: Always
Bug #536622 seems to be only triggered if "\usepackage{preview}" is used. Could some adjust #536622's title? I don't think this should block pgf-3 stabilization, especially since a workaround[1] exists. 1: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/192649/1280
(In reply to Florian Schmaus from comment #1) > Bug #536622 seems to be only triggered if "\usepackage{preview}" is used. > Could some adjust #536622's title? I don't think this should block pgf-3 > stabilization, especially since a workaround[1] exists. > > 1: http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/192649/1280 it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked until pgf3 is stable
(In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #2) > it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked > until pgf3 is stable Are you sure that you didn't confuse the dependency direction of those two bugs? #536622 is triggered by pgf-3, so if it becomes stable (what this bug is about) more users would actually hit the bug, instead of the bug being fixed. Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536622 shows "Blocks: 522588". And this issue only lists #556004 as blocked.
(In reply to Florian Schmaus from comment #3) > (In reply to Alexis Ballier from comment #2) > > it is not blocking pgf3 stabilization but rather bug #536622 is blocked > > until pgf3 is stable > > Are you sure that you didn't confuse the dependency direction of those two > bugs? #536622 is triggered by pgf-3, so if it becomes stable (what this bug > is about) more users would actually hit the bug, instead of the bug being > fixed. > beamer should be stabilized first, yes > Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536622 shows "Blocks: 522588". > And this issue only lists #556004 as blocked. yes
let's go for 3.0.1
amd64 stable
x86 stable
ppc stable
ia64 stable
arm stable
Stable on alpha.
Dear Maintainer (or who is mainly involved in this stable request), This is an auto-generated message that will move the current component to the new component Stabilization. To ensure that the stabilization will proceed correctly, please fill the fields "Atoms to stabilize" and "Runtime testing required" as described here: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4b2ef0e9aa7588224b8ae799c5fe31fa
ppc64 stable
sparc stable
Stable for HPPA. Closing.
