Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 519152 - mate-base/caja depends on gnome-base/gvfs[gdu]
Summary: mate-base/caja depends on gnome-base/gvfs[gdu]
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-08-05 18:39 UTC by Philipp Psurek
Modified: 2014-12-08 23:38 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
New ebuild using udisks but not gdu. (caja-1.8.1-r1.ebuild,2.36 KB, patch)
2014-10-15 15:33 UTC, Harold Anderson 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philipp Psurek 2014-08-05 18:39:53 UTC 
USE="gdu" enables sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility integration, but this is deprecated and USE="udisks" should be used instead. USE="gdu" is disabled since gvfs-1.18.3-r1. emerge world produces this output on arm:

WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency conflict:

gnome-base/gvfs:0

  (gnome-base/gvfs-1.18.3-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with
    >=gnome-base/gvfs-1.10.1:0[gdu] required by (mate-base/caja-1.8.1::gentoo, installed)
Comment 1 Harold Anderson 2014-10-15 15:33:20 UTC 
Created attachment 386732 [details, diff]
New ebuild using udisks but not gdu.
Comment 2 R030t1 2014-11-16 05:12:33 UTC 
I would like to confirm the existence of the bug and that the proposed ebuild solves it (on amd64).
Comment 3 Harold Anderson 2014-11-16 06:51:53 UTC 
For your convenience, you can find the ebuild in my overlay.

layman -a hnaparst
Comment 4 Matthias Maier gentoo-dev 2014-12-08 23:38:11 UTC 
  08 Dec 2014; Matthias Maier <tamiko@gentoo.org> +caja-1.8.2.ebuild,
  caja-1.8.1.ebuild:
  version bump; cleanup obsolete dependency (bug #519152)