I don't know if it is a regular procedure to ask for an ebuild to be unmasked. If it is not, please point me to the FAQ. I emerged the masked ebuild knetload-2.2.2.ebuild on AMD64 and everything runs fine. Could it be possible that it is unmasked on AMD64 at least? Thank you very much in advance. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Expected Results:
This is the very and only procedure to mark any ebuild testing on amd64. If you want more info about amd64 project, see amd64.gentoo.org/technotes.xml [For the next time: please append the output of "emerge info" to the bug report.] However, knetload-2.2.2 is already marked testing aka "~amd64". I marked 1.99 stable now, as -2.2.2 has not been in portage long enough to be marked stable. (at least 30 days)