Created attachment 378844 [details] x11-drivers:xf86-video-intel-2.99.912:20140614-005333.log.gz checking whether to include DRI3 support... no configure: error: DRI3 requested but prerequisites not found !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.912/work/xf86-video-intel -2.99.912_build/config.log * ERROR: x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.912::gentoo failed (configure phase) : From config.log: configure:20667: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -c -O2 -march=native -pipe - ggdb -Wa,--compress-debug-sections -I/usr/include/xorg conftest.c >&5 conftest.c:54:2: error: #error DRI3 not defined #error DRI3 not defined ^ configure:20667: $? = 1
Quoting your build log: !!! Please attach the following file when seeking support: !!! /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.912/work/xf86-video-intel-2.99.912_build/config.log
Created attachment 378880 [details] config.log Full config log. The failure is attached above - the DRI3 macro is not defined in xorg-server.h which belongs to x11-base/xorg-server.
(In reply to Maciej Piechotka from comment #2) > Created attachment 378880 [details] > config.log > > Full config log. The failure is attached above - the DRI3 macro is not > defined in xorg-server.h which belongs to x11-base/xorg-server. Just as a side note - I do have x11-proto/dri3proto and x11-proto/presentproto.
x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.912 already properly DEPENDs on x11-proto/dri3proto
xorg-server-1.14 does not have dri3 support yet, and dri3 is automagic in xf86-video-intel. We will either have to raise the dependency, or find a way to explicitly disable dri3 in the intel driver.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=7bc669dd4b7e3e5978e95e4131d1f9215afbc041 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=5a0cb1049c2fa0586708719210a2d2cffa7a4491 Once these 2 land in a release (or if we decide to patch .912), we can then decide what to do with dri3 and present (USE flag, force on or off).
Would it be proper to mask until fix is available?
(In reply to Jacob Godserv from comment #7) I don't think so. If you run latest unstable xorg-server and xf86-video-intel, you will not be affected. Only users who choose to mix latest unstable xf86-video-intel with older xorg-server will see this issue.
I think it's very likely this is fixed in a new version of the driver. If it's not, please file a bug upstream at bugs.freedesktop.org. We're not prepared to fix driver issues that aren't fixed upstream.
