510610 – x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58 - newexe: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp/sunflower does not exist

Bug 510610 - x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58 - newexe: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp/sunflower does not exist

Summary: x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58 - newexe: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-...

Status:	RESOLVED INVALID

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	AMD64 Linux

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Julian Ospald

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2014-05-18 01:56 UTC by Aleksey Frolov
Modified:	2014-05-25 05:11 UTC (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
emerge --info '=x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58' (info,15.78 KB, text/plain) 2014-05-18 01:59 UTC, Aleksey Frolov	Details
build.log (build.log,3.26 KB, text/plain) 2014-05-18 02:01 UTC, Aleksey Frolov	Details
ls -lA /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp/ (ls_-lA,381 bytes, text/plain) 2014-05-19 01:27 UTC, Aleksey Frolov	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Aleksey Frolov 2014-05-18 01:56:27 UTC

*   !!! newexe: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp/sunflower does not exist

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Aleksey Frolov 2014-05-18 01:59:20 UTC

Created attachment 377178 [details]
emerge --info '=x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58'

Comment 2 Aleksey Frolov 2014-05-18 02:01:12 UTC

Created attachment 377180 [details]
build.log

Comment 3 Михаил 2014-05-18 20:00:32 UTC

Portage 2.2.10 (default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop, gcc-4.8.2, glibc-2.17, 3.14.3-gentoo x86_64)
...
dev-lang/python:          2.7.5-r3, 3.3.3


Works for me.

Comment 4 Julian Ospald 2014-05-18 20:07:41 UTC

I can't reproduce this

Comment 5 Michał Górny archtester

2014-05-18 21:06:47 UTC

Neither do I. Looking at the ebuild, the file would be created by bash for sed output. Since I don't see any bash error, I suspect it must have succeeded created the file... but how then can't newexe see it?

@Aleksey: is there anything unusual about your system that could affect this? Could you list us the contents of /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp after the failing build/

Comment 6 Aleksey Frolov 2014-05-19 01:25:36 UTC

It's stable Funtoo Linux with portage-2.3.6-r7

If for you just works, I wrote there this bug http://bugs.funtoo.org/browse/FL-1244

Comment 7 Aleksey Frolov 2014-05-19 01:27:43 UTC

Created attachment 377216 [details]
ls -lA /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/sunflower-0.1_alpha58/temp/

Comment 8 Julian Ospald 2014-05-19 18:53:55 UTC

(In reply to Aleksey Frolov from comment #6)
> It's stable Funtoo Linux with portage-2.3.6-r7
> 

I don't run funtoo. If you can test this on gentoo, please reopen.

Comment 9 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2014-05-25 05:11:47 UTC

This bug is caused by usage of Portage not having fix for bug #484332, which was fixed in vanilla Portage 2.2.2 released on 2013-09-10.