Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 50989 - Apache 2 with LDAP segfaults
Summary: Apache 2 with LDAP segfaults
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Server (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Apache Team - Bugzilla Reports
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-13 16:12 UTC by gentoo.bugs
Modified: 2005-04-23 19:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
strace output (strace.out,10.65 KB, text/plain)
2004-05-14 03:21 UTC, gentoo.bugs
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gentoo.bugs 2004-05-13 16:12:30 UTC
I just tried several times to emerge Apache 2.0.49-r1, resulting in a segfaulting apache2 binary. Going back to a previous ebuild had the same result. Changing CFLAGS didn't seem to be the issue, however, it seems that Apache was configured to use LDAP (which was not anymore in my USE flags, but a while ago it has been for a short period of time). 
I've had to change my USE flags to include -ldap to forcefully prevent it from using LDAP functionality and hence to prevent getting a segfaulting binary.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge apache (logic dictates one should also have LDAP already installed?)
2. Try to run it, it segfaults
3. Rebuild with -ldap in the USE-flags, and it works.



Expected Results:  
It should have build a non-segfaulting binary right away. :)

OpenLDAP 2.1.26 is currently still installed on my system, although not yet in
active usage by me.
Comment 1 Minati jean michel 2004-05-14 02:40:02 UTC
I can't reproduce the bug, can you give the result of emerge info please ?
maybe a log of strace could be usefull too.
Comment 2 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-14 03:21:59 UTC
Created attachment 31402 [details]
strace output

This is the strace output of my segfaulting Apache2 binary, built with LDAP
support.
Comment 3 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-14 03:26:52 UTC
Here's the output of 'emerge info':

Portage 2.0.50-r6 (default-x86-2004.0, gcc-3.3.2, glibc-2.3.2-r9, 2.4.25-gentoo)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.25-gentoo i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.90GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.10
distcc 2.13 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.58-r1
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fstack-protector"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /etc/tomcat /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/bind /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fstack-protector"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.tiscali.nl/gentoo/ http://ftp6.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo ftp://ftp.join.uni-muenster.de/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo http://ftp.easynet.nl/mirror/gentoo/ http://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo/ http://ftp.gentoo.skynet.be/pub/gentoo/ http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/ http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/ http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo ftp://sunsite.ualberta.ca/pub/unix/Linux/gentoo/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="3dfx X Xaw3d aalib acpi acpi4linux alsa apache2 apm arts avi berkdb cdr crypt cups curl dga directfb dnd dvd encode esd fbcon flash foomaticdb gatos gd gd-external gdbm gif gnome gphoto2 gpm gtk gtk2 imap imlib innodb ipv6 java jpeg kde kerberos ldap libg++ libwww linguas_nl mad mbox mdb mikmod motif mozilla mpeg mysql nas ncurses nls odbc oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib perl pic png python qt quicktime radeon readline samba sasl sdk sdl slang spell sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tiff truetype usagi usb v4l vim-with-x wmf x86 xml xml2 xmms xosd xv xvid zlib"


It was interesting to me to see LDAP in between those USE flags. Doing some research it seems to have included it from /etc/make.profiles/use.default because the LDAP package was installed. So to me that in each case explains why Apache2 was building with LDAP support although it was not in my USE flags. It still remains however that when build against LDAP the binary segfaults on my system. The strace output has been added as well as attachment.
Comment 4 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-14 06:55:24 UTC
I have not been able to reproduce it either. Could you do the following:

ldd /usr/sbin/apache2

Thanks
Comment 5 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-14 14:45:59 UTC
ldd /var/tmp/portage/apache-2.0.49-r1/image/usr/sbin/apache2
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x48f8a000)
        libaprutil-0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 (0x4002f000)
        libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0x40044000)
        libbind.so.2 => /usr/lib/libbind.so.2 (0x40074000)
        libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x49bdb000)
        libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x400bc000)
        libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x400cf000)
        libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x400ff000)
        liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x401f8000)
        libgdbm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.2 (0x49d12000)
        libdb-4.1.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so (0x40204000)
        libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x491b5000)
        libapr-0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libapr-0.so.0 (0x402c6000)
        librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x402e6000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x402f9000)
        libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4031a000)
        libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40347000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4035c000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x403ad000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x403b0000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
Comment 6 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-14 19:42:18 UTC
Which version of berkely db are you using?
Comment 7 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-14 22:45:33 UTC
Berkeley DB 4.1.25

Output of 'etcat -v db':

*  sys-libs/db :
        [  I] 1.85-r1 (1)
        [   ] 3.2.9-r7 (3)
        [  I] 3.2.9-r9 (3)
        [M~ ] 3.2.9-r10 (3)
        [M~ ] 3.3.11 (3)
        [  I] 4.0.14-r2 (4)
        [   ] 4.0.14-r3 (4)
        [  I] 4.1.25_p1-r3 (4.1)
        [M~ ] 4.2.52_p1 (4.2)
        [M~ ] 4.2.52_p2 (4.2)
Comment 8 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-18 20:13:45 UTC
Minati,

Which db version are you using?
Comment 9 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-18 20:30:46 UTC
Also can you go to your /usr/include/db.h and grep for the following:

DB_VERSION_MAJOR
DB_VERSION_MINOR
DB_VERSION_PATCH

Also I have noticed that you have db-4.0 installed as well. Can you do a ldd of /usr/lib/openldap/slapd.

Thanks
Comment 10 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2004-05-18 21:03:43 UTC
could we please also have the output of 
'ls -l /usr/include/db* /usr/lib/libdb*'
Comment 11 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-19 09:00:01 UTC
------------------------------------------------------
 From '/usr/include/db.h':
------------------------------------------------------

/*
 * Berkeley DB version information.
 */
#define DB_VERSION_MAJOR        4
#define DB_VERSION_MINOR        1
#define DB_VERSION_PATCH        25
#define DB_VERSION_STRING       "Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)"

------------------------------------------------------
 Output of 'ldd /usr/lib/openldap/slapd':
------------------------------------------------------

        libldap_r.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2 (0x4002f000)
        liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x40063000)
        libdb-4.1.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so (0x4006f000)
        libperl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libperl.so.1 (0x40130000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4022a000)
        libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x4024b000)
        libiodbc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libiodbc.so.2 (0x4024f000)
        libiodbcinst.so.2 => /usr/lib/libiodbcinst.so.2 (0x40292000)
        libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4029d000)
        libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x49bdb000)
        libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x402ca000)
        libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x402dc000)
        libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x4030d000)
        libbind.so.2 => /usr/lib/libbind.so.2 (0x40406000)
        libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4044e000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40463000)
        libltdl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 (0x404b3000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x404ba000)
        libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x404be000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x404c7000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

------------------------------------------------------	
 Output of 'ls -l /usr/include/db* /usr/lib/libdb*':
------------------------------------------------------

lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      10 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/include/db.h -> db4.1/db.h
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      14 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/include/db_185.h -> db4.1/db_185.h
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      11 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb-1.so -> libdb1.so.2
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  745438 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-3.2.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     629 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-3.2.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  593694 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-3.2.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      12 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb-3.so -> libdb-3.2.so
-r--r--r--  1 root root  850264 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-4.0.a
-r--r--r--  1 root root     703 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-4.0.la
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root root  696598 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb-4.0.so
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1081704 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     703 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  798668 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      11 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb.a -> libdb-4.1.a
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      12 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb.so -> libdb-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      11 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb.so.2 -> libdb1.so.2
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      12 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb.so.3 -> libdb-3.2.so
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  851686 Apr 25  2003 /usr/lib/libdb1.a
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      11 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb1.so -> libdb1.so.2
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root   64377 Apr 25  2003 /usr/lib/libdb1.so.2
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  815554 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-3.2.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     649 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-3.2.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  652713 Sep  3  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-3.2.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      16 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-3.so -> libdb_cxx-3.2.so
-r--r--r--  1 root root  938704 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.0.a
-r--r--r--  1 root root     731 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.0.la
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root root  772837 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.0.so
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1176790 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.1.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     731 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.1.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  864680 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      15 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.a -> libdb_cxx-4.1.a
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      16 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.so -> libdb_cxx-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      16 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_cxx.so.3 -> libdb_cxx-3.2.so
-r--r--r--  1 root root  962088 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.0.a
-r--r--r--  1 root root     738 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.0.la
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root root  786469 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.0.so
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1195894 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.1.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     738 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.1.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  884832 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_java-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      16 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_java.a -> libdb_java-4.1.a
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      17 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_java.so -> libdb_java-4.1.so
-r--r--r--  1 root root  992360 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.0.a
-r--r--r--  1 root root     731 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.0.la
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root root  809933 Aug 23  2003 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.0.so
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 1177256 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.1.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     731 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.1.la
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  864924 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-4.1.so
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      15 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.a -> libdb_tcl-4.1.a
lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root      16 Mar  7 01:02 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so -> libdb_tcl-4.1.so

/usr/include/db1:
total 24
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 8298 Apr 25  2003 db.h
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 4456 Apr 25  2003 mpool.h
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 2881 Apr 25  2003 ndbm.h

/usr/include/db3:
total 84
-r--r--r--  1 root root 51043 Sep  3  2003 db.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root  5657 Sep  3  2003 db_185.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root 19263 Sep  3  2003 db_cxx.h

/usr/include/db4:
total 116
-r--r--r--  1 root root  1209 Aug 23  2003 cxx_common.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root  2129 Aug 23  2003 cxx_except.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root 70362 Aug 23  2003 db.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root  5903 Aug 23  2003 db_185.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root 22225 Aug 23  2003 db_cxx.h

/usr/include/db4.1:
total 128
-r--r--r--  1 root root  1212 Mar  7 01:02 cxx_common.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root  3967 Mar  7 01:02 cxx_except.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root 78588 Mar  7 01:02 db.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root  6210 Mar  7 01:02 db_185.h
-r--r--r--  1 root root 25120 Mar  7 01:02 db_cxx.h

Comment 12 Minati jean michel 2004-05-19 09:47:06 UTC
chuck ,
I installed the same version as mentionned above :
3.2.9-r10,3.3.11,4.2.52_p1,4.2.52_p2 

I still can't reproduce the bug.
Comment 13 David Stanek 2004-05-19 10:56:16 UTC
Looks like this may be the same as #39667.
Comment 14 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-21 19:50:13 UTC
Well there was 38 bugs related to apache2 and LDAP including 4 bugs causing segfaults. When the bugs have commited to cvs upstream then we will be intergrating the bug fixes into -r2.
Comment 15 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-22 09:31:50 UTC
I have added a patch to -r1 that might fix the problem. Please test., if its still not working correctly. Please follow the debugging instructions on the following:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html

Thanks
chuck
Comment 16 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-22 15:00:30 UTC
Hi, thanks for your help so far already. And this does indeed seem like it might be the same issue as #39667. So my apologies for having reported it again. I must have missed it during my search prior to reporting.

Chuck, thanks for the patch, I've done emerge sync and I see the files being from today and a LDAP patch being present. However, unfortunately it still crashes. I've tried both the -r1 and -r2 ebuilds.

Using the GDB instructions at the Apache website I get the following:

	GNU gdb 6.0
	Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
	GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
	welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
	Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
	There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
	This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library 	"/lib/libthread_db.so.1".

	(gdb) b ap_process_request
	Breakpoint 1 at 0x80656b5
	(gdb) run -X -d /usr/lib/apache2
	Starting program: /var/tmp/portage/apache-2.0.49-r1/work/httpd-2.0.49/.libs/apache2 -X -d 	/usr/lib/apache2
	[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
	[New Thread 16384 (LWP 4301)]
	
	Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
	[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 4301)]
	0x4042951c in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
Comment 17 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-25 06:09:44 UTC
what if you try this?

USE="threads" emerge apache.

chuck
Comment 18 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-25 06:22:51 UTC
Ive also added support for compiling a static LDAP in 2.0.49-r2. Please test by using the following USE FLAGS:

USE="LDAP static" emerge apache-2.0.49-r2.

Thanks
chuck
Comment 19 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-25 10:53:56 UTC
I've quickly tried both suggestions:

USE="threads" emerge apache

fails during configuration:

Configuring Apache Portable Runtime library ...

checking for APR... reconfig
updating cache /var/tmp/portage/apache-2.0.49-r1/work/httpd-2.0.49/config.cache
configuring package in srclib/apr now
configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use --host.
    If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be used.
configure: loading cache /var/tmp/portage/apache-2.0.49-r1/work/httpd-2.0.49/config.cache
checking build system type... (cached) i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... (cached) i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... (cached) i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configuring APR library
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for working mkdir -p... (cached) yes
APR Version: 0.9.5
checking for chosen layout... apr
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
configure failed for srclib/apr

!!! ERROR: net-www/apache-2.0.49-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 177, Exitcode 1
!!! bad ./configure please submit bug report to bugs.gentoo.org. Include your config.layout.



USE="LDAP static" emerge apache-2.0.49-r2 

results in Apache still segfaulting.


Sidenote: I noticed a typo in the Apache-2.0.49 -r1 / -r2 ebuilds, it's informing a 'DB verison detected' instead of a version. :)

Comment 20 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-29 11:23:40 UTC
Can you add the following to your apache.conf, restart and have a look at the error_logs.
                                                                               
LogLevel debug
                                                                               
More information can be found at
                                                                               
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html#loglevel
                                                                               
Thanks
chuck
Comment 21 gentoo.bugs 2004-05-29 12:18:23 UTC
No luck with the LogLevel, it doesn't seem to log a thing. I did do a ltrace however. The last lines seem to suggest it crashes when calling apr_sockaddr_info_get(). It still doesn't give me an idea right now about what is wrong, but maybe it might be usefull information. :)


apr_file_open_stderr(0x080b6db8, 0x080a8a78, 108, 0, 0x402d619c)             = 0
apr_palloc(0x080a8a78, 16, 108, 0, 0x402d619c)                               = 0x080b6e50
apr_sockaddr_info_get(0x080b6e54, 0, 2, 0, 0 <unfinished ...>
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Comment 22 Chuck Short (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-15 04:20:34 UTC
No progress..Please submit a bug upstream.

http://issues.apache.org. Please attach bug # here.

Thanks
Comment 23 gentoo.bugs 2004-06-29 05:00:55 UTC
Reported as Issue #29572 at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29572
Comment 24 gentoo.bugs 2004-08-24 05:21:20 UTC
Same solution as Gentoo bug #39667:
Having OpenLDAP not being compiled against libbind, but against libresolv instead stopped the segfaulting of Apache.

This (old) OpenLDAP issue might be related: http://www.openldap.org/its/?findid=1304

The patch posted there apparently got outdated since it does not cleanly apply anymore, however, manually patching the configuration script and switching the order of lib_bind and lib_resolv had my OpenLDAP built against libresolv instead of libbind. 
Perhaps the Gentoo OpenLDAP ebuild should include such a patch to prevent this problem from surfacing again (although the latest unmasked Bind ebuild does not include --enable-libbind anymore, which is a solution as well).
Comment 25 Elfyn McBratney (beu) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-23 19:55:55 UTC
Is this still an issue ?