Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 502160 - Some gnome stuff was accidentally marked stable
Summary: Some gnome stuff was accidentally marked stable
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Pacho Ramos
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 502170 502188 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-02-22 19:07 UTC by Toralf Förster
Modified: 2016-08-11 11:16 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Toralf Förster gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 19:07:42 UTC
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7505130#7505130

and IRC channel (freenode) isn't available - therefore this report
Comment 1 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 20:42:45 UTC
An overview of the repoman output is available at:

http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-current-issues.txt
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 20:59:32 UTC
Sorry a lot. Was an accident due me running the wrong script (the one for committing) instead of the one only running "repoman full" to prepare the Gnome 3.10 stabilization list with all the dependencies.

I am reverting it just now after discussion in #gentoo-infra (thanks a lot to all the people that helped me)

Sorry again :(
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 21:12:49 UTC
*** Bug 502170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 21:36:38 UTC
Using the following bit of code:

    directory=~/.maildir/.INBOX.Mailing\ Lists.Commits/

    for f in $(grep -rl '^[ ]*arch stable, bug 888' $directory) ; do
        grep Subject ${f} | sed 's/.*commit in //' | sed 's/ ChangeLog//'
    done | sort | uniq > ~/GNOME.fixed

We can get a list of packages and ebuilds that were affected:

    http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomwij/files/tmp/GNOME.affected

If we replace the commit message by the one that fixes it:

    Fix wrong commit, bug 502160

We can also generate a list of those that are fixed:

    http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomwij/files/tmp/GNOME.fixed

In the end, when we're done; we can verify our work this way:

    http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomwij/files/tmp/GNOME.diff

I'll run this every once in a while; if you want me to run it, let me know. I expect to run this when the revert is done so we can at least verify on the ChangeLog level that everything is addressed; if someone is interested, we can later try to verify this on a diff based level.
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-02-22 23:25:30 UTC
I think all is ok now
Comment 6 Jack 2014-02-23 00:39:57 UTC
For me, glibmm is still trying to upgrade to 2.38.1 from 2.36.2 and that is trying to pull in the unstable glib.  I am assuming it is just a question of waiting for the changes to propagate to the rest of the mirrors.
Comment 7 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-23 01:22:41 UTC
(In reply to Jack from comment #6)
> For me, glibmm is still trying to upgrade to 2.38.1 from 2.36.2 and that is
> trying to pull in the unstable glib.  I am assuming it is just a question of
> waiting for the changes to propagate to the rest of the mirrors.

Indeed, that package is still affected:

    http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-cpp/glibmm/

A quick look at the updated diff reveals that these are still affected:

    app-editors/latexila: latexila-2.10.1.ebuild
    dev-cpp/glibmm: glibmm-2.38.1.ebuild

Looking at the other one mentioned, it indeed is still affected:

    http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-editors/latexila/
Comment 8 Ari Entlich 2014-02-23 05:17:31 UTC
What's with the packages that are in the "fixed" list but not in the "affected" list?
Comment 9 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-23 07:15:26 UTC
(In reply to Ari Entlich from comment #8)
> What's with the packages that are in the "fixed" list but not in the
> "affected" list?

Some are just split up versions of the "affected" list; there also appear to be a few false positives where no actual change has been made to the file, I hope.
Comment 10 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-02-23 09:49:23 UTC
*** Bug 502188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Tom Wijsman (TomWij) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-23 10:09:35 UTC
+  23 Feb 2014; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> glibmm-2.38.1.ebuild:
+  Revert wrong commit

Pacho has requested me to do the other commit:

+  23 Feb 2014; Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> latexila-2.10.1.ebuild:
+  Fix wrong commit, bug 502160

Done.