Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 496344 - [qt overlay] dev-qt/qtwayland snapshot request
Summary: [qt overlay] dev-qt/qtwayland snapshot request
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Qt Bug Alias
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-12-29 04:34 UTC by hertz642
Modified: 2014-03-18 22:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
qtwayland-5.2_pre20131229.ebuild (qtwayland-5.2_pre20131229.ebuild,835 bytes, text/plain)
2013-12-29 21:37 UTC, David Heidelberg (okias)
Details
Ebuild using the last Qt commit the day before the 5.2.0 release. (qtwayland-5.2_pre20131210.ebuild,835 bytes, text/plain)
2013-12-31 00:44 UTC, hertz642
Details
build.log (build.log,191.20 KB, text/plain)
2014-02-17 09:54 UTC, Malte E.
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description hertz642 2013-12-29 04:34:32 UTC
Many of the Qt5 packages have recently had ~amd64 ebuilds (5.2.0) added in addition to the ** ebuilds (5.2.9999), but qtwayland has not. All of qtwayland's dependencies now have a 5.2.0 ebuild, and I can confirm that it has been building properly for me for a couple weeks and also I can build and run Qt5 applications for Wayland using it.
Comment 1 David Heidelberg (okias) 2013-12-29 21:25:13 UTC
Live package wont be changed to ~arch (that's rule).

But maybe we could bump tarball?
Comment 2 David Heidelberg (okias) 2013-12-29 21:37:33 UTC
Created attachment 366484 [details]
qtwayland-5.2_pre20131229.ebuild

Does this ebuild work for you same as 5.2.9999 ?
Comment 3 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-12-30 00:04:10 UTC
Sorry, I'm not interested in a snapshot at this time... what's preventing you from using the live ebuild?

(In reply to hertz642 from comment #0)
> Many of the Qt5 packages have recently had ~amd64 ebuilds (5.2.0) added in
> addition to the ** ebuilds (5.2.9999), but qtwayland has not.

That's because there hasn't been a 5.2.0 release of qtwayland.
Comment 4 David Heidelberg (okias) 2013-12-30 20:06:19 UTC
(In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #3)
> Sorry, I'm not interested in a snapshot at this time... what's preventing
> you from using the live ebuild?

dependencies ? It require qt-5.2.9999.
Comment 5 hertz642 2013-12-31 00:44:58 UTC
Created attachment 366614 [details]
Ebuild using the last Qt commit the day before the 5.2.0 release.

The pre20131229 ebuild didn't work for me, but this one did.

I didn't realize that there hasn't been a 5.2.0 release of qtwayland, but the lack of one has been giving me some compilation problems. If two live Qt5 builds are too far apart in age, compilation usually fails for me. I even had one that failed when the packages were 24 hours apart, but it went away when I updated all of the Qt builds. It would be nice to have something that didn't pull all of 5.2.9999 and cause these sorts of problems.
Comment 6 David Heidelberg (okias) 2014-01-07 11:21:12 UTC
Info: qtwayland will work with >= 5.2.1, so no luck with 5.2.0

[ fatal error: QtWaylandClient/private/qwayland-wayland.h: No such file or directory ]
Comment 7 David Heidelberg (okias) 2014-01-12 14:52:18 UTC
anyway, qtwayland should require QT >=5.2.1, not 5.2.${PV} == 5.2.9999. (qtwayland isn't part of qt set)
Comment 8 David Heidelberg (okias) 2014-02-15 12:50:57 UTC
qt 5.2.1 release, could you retest my ebuild ?

Anyway, I lowered dependency in qtwayland-5.2.9999, so now it works on >=5.2.1
Comment 9 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-02-15 14:36:23 UTC
(In reply to David Heidelberger (okias) from comment #8)
> Anyway, I lowered dependency in qtwayland-5.2.9999, so now it works on
> >=5.2.1

great, so this ↓

(In reply to David Heidelberger (okias) from comment #4)
> (In reply to Davide Pesavento from comment #3)
> > Sorry, I'm not interested in a snapshot at this time... what's preventing
> > you from using the live ebuild?
> 
> dependencies ? It require qt-5.2.9999.

...no longer applies. And maintaining a snapshot is even less worthwhile now.
Comment 10 Malte E. 2014-02-17 09:54:33 UTC
Created attachment 370618 [details]
build.log

Not sure if this is related, but I'm having problems compiling qtwayland