Created attachment 363108 [details] lxc-0.9.0.ebuild known bugs 1. fails with use doc 2. examples are .bz2-ed and they shouldn't be 3. not sure if app-text/docbook-sgml-utils is still needed
Comment on attachment 363108 [details] lxc-0.9.0.ebuild CRLF...
carriage return line feed? or can't reproduce lame fsck? :D anyhow https://raw.github.com/dalu/dalu-gentoo-overlay/master/app-emulation/lxc/lxc-0.9.0.ebuild
Hi, I ported previus ebuild to work with 0.9.0. docbook2man is fixed after use patch on configure.ac (after #205703) i didn't fix examples. LXC moves to github so i have to update SRC_URI to it. All you can find in https://gist.github.com/bambuchaAdm/7504651
any update?
Hi, there where a previous try to bump for lxc-0.9.0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465706 Anyway, lxc-1.0.0rc1 is comming in few days (weeks for final) and started writing an ebuild (lxc-9999) for it. My ebuild is a mix of better (I think) parts of many ebuilds out there. If some are interested in testing, we could have a nice ebuild for 1.0 :)
(In reply to Guillaume ZITTA from comment #5) > Hi, there where a previous try to bump for lxc-0.9.0: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465706 > > Anyway, lxc-1.0.0rc1 is comming in few days (weeks for final) and started > writing an ebuild (lxc-9999) for it. > > My ebuild is a mix of better (I think) parts of many ebuilds out there. > > If some are interested in testing, we could have a nice ebuild for 1.0 :) I forgot link :) https://github.com/gza/gentoo-lxc-overlay
lxc 1.0.1 is the latest version available. I took the app-emulation/lxc-0.9.0.ebuild provided at https://github.com/gza/gentoo-lxc-overlay (referenced in comment #6), and changed the name to lxc-1.0.1.ebuild, and it seemed to work OK for me (I built with -lua).
I should have added that I built lxc-1.0.1 without the 0.9.0 patches from the ebuild directory in the lxc-overlay.
*** Bug 506894 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
@virtualization: Are you still interested in lxc? Is there a dedicated maintainer? Diego or Tiziano do not appear to have much time for this. If you are looking for a dedicated maintainer I can help as I am using this package myself.
I bumped it to 1.0.3 and I masked it for further testing.