I think it would be nice to stabilize this. Maintainers?
@blueness: ok for stabilization?
Yes, okay for stabilization. Its keyworded for KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~x86" but I think we should stablize just for amd64, arm and x86. I'm cc-ing hppa and ia64 so they can decide what they want.
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #2) > Yes, okay for stabilization. Its keyworded for KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~hppa > ~ia64 ~x86" No, 0.9 isn't. ecdsa-0.9.ebuild : ~amd64 ~x86 > but I think we should stablize just for amd64, arm and x86. I'm > cc-ing hppa and ia64 so they can decide what they want. Is anything wrong with 0.10? It was only keyworded recently for bug #490374.
ping
Yeah, please tell us if 0.10 is better (to not need to wait for stabilization of both versions) ;) Thanks
Yeah, sounds good.
Actually, I'm not a maintainer, but I think it would make sense to add the python herd here. Any objections from the maintainers?
0.10 stable for HPPA.
ia64 stable
Builds fine on x86. Rdep builds and runs tests fine as well. Please mark stable for x86.
amd64 stable
arm stable
x86 stable, thanks to Myckel Last arch, closing