Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 490246 - sys-apps/sandbox: prefix support
Summary: sys-apps/sandbox: prefix support
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Sandbox (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Sandbox Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: prefix-gx86
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-11-03 10:08 UTC by Benda Xu
Modified: 2021-03-17 06:43 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
sandbox-ebuild.patch (sandbox-ebuild.patch,2.56 KB, patch)
2013-11-03 10:10 UTC, Benda Xu
Details | Diff
sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch (sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch,27.03 KB, patch)
2013-11-03 10:12 UTC, Benda Xu
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2013-11-03 10:08:49 UTC
Hi, please review the patches of Prefix support for sandbox.

As long as sandbox is a gentoo project, why are we maintaining a long list of patches in FILESDIR?

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2013-11-03 10:10:36 UTC
Created attachment 362474 [details, diff]
sandbox-ebuild.patch

EAPI bump.
Comment 2 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2013-11-03 10:12:14 UTC
Created attachment 362476 [details, diff]
sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch

substitute /etc, /var and /bin/bash with those of Prefix.
Comment 3 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2013-11-03 10:16:56 UTC
configure and Makefile.in are generated from configure.ac and Makefile.am respectively. They are included in the patch only for reference.
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2013-11-27 21:43:41 UTC
Comment on attachment 362474 [details, diff]
sandbox-ebuild.patch

>+EAPI=5

no.  this cannot exceed 2 as long as portage does not.
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2013-11-27 21:44:30 UTC
Comment on attachment 362476 [details, diff]
sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch

create proper patches using the sandbox.git repo and `git send-email` them
Comment 6 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2013-12-16 04:12:42 UTC
(In reply to SpanKY from comment #5)
> Comment on attachment 362476 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch
> 
> create proper patches using the sandbox.git repo and `git send-email` them

Thanks Mike. Patch sent.

Message-Id: <1387168647-13784-1-git-send-email-heroxbd@gentoo.org>
Comment 7 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2014-01-18 03:15:14 UTC
(In reply to Benda Xu from comment #6)
> (In reply to SpanKY from comment #5)
> > Comment on attachment 362476 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff]
> > sandbox-2.6-prefix.patch
> > 
> > create proper patches using the sandbox.git repo and `git send-email` them
> 
> Thanks Mike. Patch sent.
> 
> Message-Id: <1387168647-13784-1-git-send-email-heroxbd@gentoo.org>

Hi, Mike. In case you missed the last email. I've sent a new one with

Message-Id: <1390014816-7948-1-git-send-email-heroxbd@gentoo.org>
Comment 8 Rick Farina (Zero_Chaos) gentoo-dev 2014-02-01 17:21:01 UTC
The profiles will require EAPI 5 in 30 day, so clinging to old EAPI is pointless now.

This has been an issue for a much longer time than this bug, and there is a patch available.  Where are we on this?  Sandbox is a good thing, I think we want this support in prefix.
Comment 9 Benda Xu gentoo-dev 2014-12-04 04:49:31 UTC
Hello, Mike. Any update in the reviewing?
Comment 10 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2016-01-29 11:55:52 UTC
Yet another friendly ping.

@vapier: please, tell us your thoughts about this
Comment 11 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2016-01-29 22:32:00 UTC
i posted an update to Benda's latest e-mail
Comment 12 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2017-09-26 10:27:13 UTC
What's the status here? If there's still some patch not applied, could you resend it since there are new people on the alias?
Comment 13 Fabian Groffen gentoo-dev 2021-01-06 10:19:53 UTC
I see sandbox in use for Linux RAP (Prefix), so I guess this is sorted these days.
Comment 14 Nathan Shearer 2021-03-17 06:42:48 UTC
The make.conf file generated in Prefix still contains a reference to this bug and FEATURES="-sandbox"

Is it save to remove that? Should it also be removed from new make.conf files that are generated by Prefix?