Hi, this is the new nbsmtp ebuild. You may check updates and info at http://nbsmtp.ferdyx.org Regards.
Created attachment 29509 [details] nbsmtp-0.92.ebuild
Created attachment 29510 [details] nbsmtp-0.92.ebuild Changed a dosbin to dobin, was a stupid mistake.
Created attachment 31044 [details] possible improved ebuild I have tried to improve this ebuild a bit. This involved putting "use_enable" instead, getting rid of "S=", changing "nbsmtp-${PV}" to "${P}", adding the COPYING file to dodoc and removing the superfluous dodir. Oh, and also, I think it's best to have the description the same for all packages? But then I guess that's up to the author or maintainer to decide. :)
Have tested with all the USE combinations ;) Works great.
hey... lot of thanks for improving the ebuild. But only one thing... http://physeeks.dyndns.org:8000/software.html is the home page for nbsmtp versions up to 0.8. We took over the project and our first release was 0.9; so 0.92 ebuild should have http://nbsmtp.ferdyx.org as its homepage. Regards, Ferdy
I'm not sure whether it's good to have a different site for different versions of an ebuild, but you're probably right. I'll leave it up to (whoever) eventually puts this in portage. Until then I'm going to randomly badger a few people on net-mail... I do want this is portage. :)
Well... the real new home page is http://nbsmtp.ferdyx.org since he is not mantaining nbsmtp anymore. So the really best thing is to remove 0.8 version as soon as possible. Cheers, Ferdy
*** Bug 44771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 31083 [details] nbsmtp-0.92.ebuild (improved) This just fixes the HOMEPAGE issue and adds ~hppa to the keywords, I've tried on a PA-RISC and works fine. Cheers, Ferdy
Hmmm, is v0.92 not in portage tree ? Thanks ...
No it is not: http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=net-mail;name=nbsmtp Cheers, Ferdy
Thanks! Added to cvs. I made a number of minor changes to the ebuild, including removing the virtual/mta block and PROVIDE and the mailbase dep (the former because it refers to /usr/sbin/sendmail and the latter because it isn't actually used). Thanks again!