Bug 480990 – x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.22 stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Raymond Jennings 2013-08-14 07:07:04 UTC]

[New LWP 31676]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `pacman -root'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  pacman_is_bonus_dot (pp=pp@entry=0x80756d8, x=20, y=19, idx=idx@entry=0xbf8fd07c) at pacman_level.c:544
#0  pacman_is_bonus_dot (pp=pp@entry=0x80756d8, x=20, y=19, idx=idx@entry=0xbf8fd07c) at pacman_level.c:544
#1  0x0804c8d6 in ate_bonus_dot (mi=0x8064298) at pacman.c:1108
#2  pacman_tick (mi=0x8064298) at pacman.c:1180
#3  0x08050fb8 in xlockmore_draw (dpy=0x8068eb0, window=20971820, closure=0x8064298) at xlockmore.c:497
#4  0x0804a767 in run_screenhack_table (ft=0x805d200 <pacman_xscreensaver_function_table>, window2=0, window=20971820, dpy=0x8068eb0) at screenhack.c:553
#5  main (argc=1, argv=0xbf8fd3f4) at screenhack.c:921

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-14 14:10:01 UTC]

This issue is fixed in 5.22.
ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964575
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xscreensaver.git/commit/?id=fab68430962f924ae55ad18ea13a53c1cd025c19
And "README" file in xscreensaver-5.22 tarball, "Changes since 5.21"

[Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2013-08-14 14:17:00 UTC]

Arch teams, please test and mark stable:
=x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.22
Targeted stable KEYWORDS : alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sh sparc x86

[Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2013-08-16 15:24:29 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 4 Homer Parker (RETIRED) 2013-08-16 19:50:44 UTC]

Stable for amd64

[Comment 5 RedEyedMan 2013-08-19 09:10:13 UTC]

Tested on x86 stable, build fine.

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-08-24 23:34:31 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-08-26 16:58:21 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-08-29 19:49:25 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-02 11:15:04 UTC]

alpha stable

[Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-05 12:23:01 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-07 20:13:15 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-09-28 20:46:32 UTC]

SH is not anymore a stable arch, removing it from the cc list

[Comment 13 Myckel Habets 2013-11-23 09:31:57 UTC]

(In reply to Galym Kerimbekov from comment #5)
> Tested on x86 stable, build fine.

+1 Please mark stable for x86.

[Comment 14 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2013-11-23 13:31:31 UTC]

(In reply to Galym Kerimbekov from comment #5)
> Tested on x86 stable, build fine.

(In reply to Myckel Habets from comment #13)
> (In reply to Galym Kerimbekov from comment #5)
> > Tested on x86 stable, build fine.
> 
> +1 Please mark stable for x86.

OK, done. Thanks for testing.