the current slot is SLOT="$(get_version_component_range 1)" which makes all 1.3 1.4 and 1.5 versions be in the same slot. Please fix it to the proper: SLOT="$(get_version_component_range 1-2)"
(In reply to Anton Bolshakov from comment #0) > the current slot is SLOT="$(get_version_component_range 1)" > > which makes all 1.3 1.4 and 1.5 versions be in the same slot. As they should be. > Please fix it to the proper: Why is that proper? What is the specific problem that you have?
I'm writing 2 ebuilds for Pentoo overlay and they require two different version of rock-protection. The same goes to dev-ruby/sinatra (it's not slotted at all) I've look through other dev-ruby/* ebuilds and they all use "get_version_component_range 1-2". The current "range 1" is pretty much pointless, you can just use slot=0 or adjust it as I suggested.
(In reply to Anton Bolshakov from comment #2) > I'm writing 2 ebuilds for Pentoo overlay and they require two different > version of rock-protection. The same goes to dev-ruby/sinatra (it's not > slotted at all) Sinatra 1..3 has 'rack-protection', '~> 1.2', meaning, in Gentoo terms ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2 =dev-ruby/rack-protection-1*". Or rather: ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2:1", as we have it. > I've look through other dev-ruby/* ebuilds and they all use > "get_version_component_range 1-2". We assume semantic versioning unless specifically indicated otherwise. It's not relevant what slotting mechanism other packages have. rubygems unfortunately does not require a specific API/ABI compatibility scheme, so we have to determine this package by package. > The current "range 1" is pretty much pointless, you can just use slot=0 or > adjust it as I suggested. No, SLOT=1 is relevant here, see the sinatra dependency.
(In reply to Hans de Graaff from comment #3) > Sinatra 1..3 has 'rack-protection', '~> 1.2', meaning, in Gentoo terms > ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2 =dev-ruby/rack-protection-1*". Or rather: > ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2:1", as we have it. > that pulls rack-protection-1.5.0 which is wrong The same goes to sinatra 1.4 which requires rack-protection ~> 1.4 and not 1.5
(In reply to Anton Bolshakov from comment #4) > (In reply to Hans de Graaff from comment #3) > > > Sinatra 1..3 has 'rack-protection', '~> 1.2', meaning, in Gentoo terms > > ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2 =dev-ruby/rack-protection-1*". Or rather: > > ">=dev-ruby/rack-protection-1.2:1", as we have it. > > > > that pulls rack-protection-1.5.0 which is wrong > > The same goes to sinatra 1.4 which requires rack-protection ~> 1.4 and not > 1.5 If you don't take my word for it, then please check http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/16#page74 It's now clear to me that this bug is in fact invalid, marking it as such.
