Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 476396 - =app-portage/eix-0.28.5 : please stabilize
Summary: =app-portage/eix-0.28.5 : please stabilize
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal
Assignee: Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-07-10 14:02 UTC by Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-07-10 16:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 14:02:41 UTC 
as per topic ; it's been +30 days and the only active bug is actually a new feature request which has been addressed in 29.0 (currently ~arch).
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 15:01:52 UTC 
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 2 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 15:38:11 UTC 
app-portage/eix-0.28.5[clang] depends on sys-devel/clang, so, if we want to stabilize app-portage/eix-0.28.5 we need to stabilize sys-devel/clang first.
Comment 3 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 15:43:52 UTC 
(In reply to Ian Stakenvicius from comment #0)
> [...] the only active bug [...]

There are 4 opened bugs for eix-0.28.5:
- bug 475564
- bug 474590
- bug 471132
- bug 471085
Comment 4 Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 16:41:25 UTC 
(In reply to Vicente Olivert Riera from comment #2)

Regarding clang, I'm fine with use.stable.mask'ing that flag


(In reply to Vicente Olivert Riera from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ian Stakenvicius from comment #0)
> > [...] the only active bug [...]
> 
> There are 4 opened bugs for eix-0.28.5:
> - bug 475564
> - bug 474590
> - bug 471132
> - bug 471085

474590 is the feature request for ~arch portage that I mentioned
471132 is not a valid bug but is being left open so that users can see it

I apologize for missing 471085 (which I thought was resolved) and 475564.  The former has been taken care of in 0.29.0 and i have no idea about the latter.  How would ATs like to proceed?  Mark RESO/INVA and try again when 0.29.0 is old enough? or...
Comment 5 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 16:47:06 UTC 
(In reply to Ian Stakenvicius from comment #4)
> How would ATs like to proceed?  Mark RESO/INVA and try again when
> 0.29.0 is old enough? or...

If all of those bugs will be fixed on 0.29.0 I would close this bug and wait until 0.29.0 be in the tree. Then I would wait 30 days to let people try that version and finally file a stable request on bugzilla.
Comment 6 Ian Stakenvicius (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-10 16:52:43 UTC 
makes sense.