Bug 472580 – Please stabilize sys-fs/fatsort-1.1.1 and dev-util/bbe-0.2.2

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Daniel Pielmeier 2013-06-07 14:03:24 UTC]

Thanks in advance.

[Comment 1 Daniel Pielmeier 2013-06-20 17:13:23 UTC]

fatsort-1.1.331 has been removed from the tree. The upstream version scheme which added the subversion revision number after the normal version caused incorrect sorted versions. All versions in tree now have the revision number removed.

Please stabilize sys-fs/fatsort-1.1.1 instead.

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-25 15:09:08 UTC]

  dependency.bad                16
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(default/linux/x86/13.0) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(default/linux/x86/13.0/desktop) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(default/linux/x86/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(default/linux/x86/13.0/desktop/kde) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(default/linux/x86/13.0/developer) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(hardened/linux/x86) ['dev-util/bbe']
   sys-fs/fatsort/fatsort-1.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND: x86(hardened/linux/x86/selinux) ['dev-util/bbe']

http://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2012/07/06/repoman-check-before-file-stable-request/

[Comment 3 Daniel Pielmeier 2013-06-25 16:28:55 UTC]

I could have mentioned this before, but yes dev-util/bbe needs to be stabilized as well. Maybe I am wrong but I was under the impression that dependency stabilization is implied.

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-25 16:32:02 UTC]

(In reply to Daniel Pielmeier from comment #3)
> Maybe I am wrong but I was under the impression that
> dependency stabilization is implied.

I don't know if you judge that dep ready for the stabilization or not, this is the reasone because I like to see all packages in the summary

[Comment 5 Daniel Pielmeier 2013-06-25 16:41:44 UTC]

(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Daniel Pielmeier from comment #3)
> > Maybe I am wrong but I was under the impression that
> > dependency stabilization is implied.
> 
> I don't know if you judge that dep ready for the stabilization or not, this
> is the reasone because I like to see all packages in the summary

Nowadays I do so but this time I simply forgot about it.

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-30 18:17:07 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-30 18:17:35 UTC]

x86 stable. Last arch, closing