Is it OK to stabilize =sys-devel/libperl-5.10.1-r1 ? If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug.
Does it really make sense to? Are there things still depending on it? For Perls >=5.12, even using sys-devel/libperl should be deprecated as I understand it. As it is, Perl <=5.10.1 is now hardmasked, and stable is 5.12.3-r1 and 5.12.4-r1 I think this means we should be phasing its existence out, not so much stabilising it.
(In reply to Kent Fredric from comment #1) > Does it really make sense to? Are there things still depending on it? > > For Perls >=5.12, even using sys-devel/libperl should be deprecated as I > understand it. > > As it is, Perl <=5.10.1 is now hardmasked, and stable is 5.12.3-r1 and > 5.12.4-r1 > > I think this means we should be phasing its existence out, not so much > stabilising it. Alright, closing then.