It's not quite a version bump, but it's still a direct successor (at least it seems to be). As fonts herd has been declared effectively defunct on gentoo-dev lately, perhaps cjk herd can take action here (as it will be best informed anyway).
(In reply to comment #0) > As fonts herd has been declared effectively defunct on gentoo-dev lately, > perhaps cjk herd can take action here (as it will be best informed anyway). Not defunct, as I'm still active, just understaffed. And do you have a link for us? I'll have a look when I have more time.
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > As fonts herd has been declared effectively defunct on gentoo-dev lately, > > perhaps cjk herd can take action here (as it will be best informed anyway). > > Not defunct, as I'm still active, just understaffed. > bug 414797 - a version bump, not quite trivial, but not that complicated either, reported on *2012-05-05* OK, so your definition of "defunct" differs from mine.("down to effectively one person" is a bit more than simply "understaffed", IMHO and that's how I read that mail) > And do you have a link for us? I'll have a look when I have more time. The homepage is still the same, there's some info in English there (a bit more in release notes), still, cjk people are best suited to tell what exactly got changed.
+*ipaex-002.01 (21 Feb 2015) + + 21 Feb 2015; Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> +files/66-ipaex.conf, + +ipaex-002.01.ebuild, +metadata.xml: + Initial commit. Fixes bug #468792. I see it more as a variant, having a separate font family name, so I've made it a separate package.
