Required for bug 465428.
I have found a little regresion: # vigra-config File "/usr/bin/vigra-config", line 61 print "1.8.0" ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax
(In reply to comment #1) > I have found a little regresion: Are you sure it's a regression? python2 /usr/bin/vigra-config works python3 /usr/bin/vigra-config doesn't
(In reply to comment #2) > Are you sure it's a regression? > > python2 /usr/bin/vigra-config works > python3 /usr/bin/vigra-config doesn't Well, I was using python3, you are right. But it's a bit weird that 1.7.1 works with python3 and 1.8.0 not.
Forget my last comment.
Done. Closing bug...
(In reply to comment #1) > I have found a little regresion: > > # vigra-config > File "/usr/bin/vigra-config", line 61 > print "1.8.0" > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax (In reply to comment #4) > Forget my last comment. well, it's still an bug that should be fixed even if it's not an regression fixed in vigra-1.8.0-r1
You guys were aware that bug #417667 was still open on this package, weren't you? That bug has just bitten me on two boxes, but there is no real damage.
(In reply to comment #7) > You guys were aware that bug #417667 was still open on this package, weren't > you? Someone else pointed it out yesterday, which was too late... > That bug has just bitten me on two boxes, but there is no real damage. See Bug 465428, Comment #0 where the actual request was made with arch's in CC list which is same as "bugs have been checked, go ahead" But... It doesn't make sense to start reverting the whole process only for USE=doc now, so only way is forward...