Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 465472 - dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.24.3 lacks glibmm.h inclusion, making media-gfx/inkscape-0.48.4 build fail
Summary: dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.24.3 lacks glibmm.h inclusion, making media-gfx/inkscape-0.48...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 464994
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-04-11 07:22 UTC by Martin von Gagern
Modified: 2013-04-11 10:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
inkscape build log (build.log,62.16 KB, text/plain)
2013-04-11 07:22 UTC, Martin von Gagern
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin von Gagern 2013-04-11 07:22:29 UTC
Created attachment 345174 [details]
inkscape build log

After upgrading several packages, gtkmm among them, remerging inkscape fails:

In file included from color-profile.cpp:9:0:
/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4/gdkmm/color.h:61:10: error: ‘GType’ does not name a type

There is a huge bunch of similar messages for various types after this first one. It seems like the header should include other gdkmm headers. Comparing the color.h from the installed gtkmm 2.24.3 to the one from 2.24.2, I see this:

--- …/gtkmm-2.24.2/image/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4/gdkmm/color.h
+++ /usr/include/gdkmm-2.4/gdkmm/color.h
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
 
-#include <glibmm.h>
+#include <glibmm/ustring.h>
+#include <sigc++/sigc++.h>
 
@@ -55,5 +56,7 @@
   typedef GdkColor BaseObjectType;
+#endif /* DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS */
 
+  /** Get the GType for this class, for use with the underlying GObject type system.
+   */
   static GType get_type() G_GNUC_CONST;
-#endif /* DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS */
 
So the previous file did include the main glibmm header, which the new one does not. The NEWS file for 2.24.3 apparently does not mention this change, or the intention behind it.
Comment 1 Martin von Gagern 2013-04-11 07:59:39 UTC
I wrote a mail to the gtkmm-list requesting clarification whether this change is intended or accidential. Depending on that, either gtkmm or inkscape should be fixed. Message still awaits moderator approval.
Comment 2 Viktor Yu. Kovalskii 2013-04-11 09:34:36 UTC
Maybe this bug is duplicate of https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464994
Comment 3 Martin von Gagern 2013-04-11 10:00:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Maybe this bug is duplicate of https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464994

It is. Except the focus here is more on gtkmm, there more on inkscape. Sorry I missed that bug report, though.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 464994 ***