Is it OK to stabilize =net-proxy/havp-0.92a-r1 ? If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug.
(In reply to comment #0) > Is it OK to stabilize =net-proxy/havp-0.92a-r1 ? Let's see: > Modify: 2013-01-10 18:26:47.000000000 +0100 Seems an appropriate amount of time has passed. > 10 Jan 2013; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> +havp-0.92a-r1.ebuild: > Respect CXXFLAGS (bug #451186, bug #451188, AR (bug #451184). Respecting the user's settings should result in a minimal amount of change. No bugs have been filed lately, so this didn't break it for anyone. Stabilization should therefore not require much effort. > If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug. There we go. Feel free to drop the old revision once stabilization is done.
amd64 stable
x86 stable. Last arch, closing