Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 462440 - media-gfx/fbgrab: ebuild improvement
Summary: media-gfx/fbgrab: ebuild improvement
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD, PATCH
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-20 08:32 UTC by Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-03-22 20:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
fbgrab-1.0-r1.ebuild (fbgrab-1.0-r1.ebuild,824 bytes, text/plain)
2013-03-20 08:32 UTC, Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED)
Details
fbgrab-zlib_h.patch (fbgrab-zlib_h.patch,376 bytes, patch)
2013-03-20 08:33 UTC, Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-03-20 08:32:43 UTC
Created attachment 342696 [details]
fbgrab-1.0-r1.ebuild

Ebuild was bumped to EAPI=5 (i also drop '-g' flag from build system). And i have attached updated patch for zlib.

@proxy-maintainers, i will take care of that.
Comment 1 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-03-20 08:33:47 UTC
Created attachment 342700 [details, diff]
fbgrab-zlib_h.patch
Comment 2 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-21 21:27:43 UTC
I see no reason to have 2 zlib_h patches. I dropped the old one and renamed this one to fbgrab-1.0-zlib_h.patch

+*fbgrab-1.0-r1 (21 Mar 2013)
+
+  21 Mar 2013; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> +fbgrab-1.0-r1.ebuild,
+  files/fbgrab-1.0-zlib_h.patch, metadata.xml:
+  Revbump for cleanup and update zlib_h patch. Bug #462440. Mikle Zlogene
+  Kolyada will maintain it.
+
Comment 3 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-22 10:20:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 342700 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> fbgrab-zlib_h.patch

This patch is wrong? Why did you change the old one? zlib.h must be included before png.h. I will revert it tonight
Comment 4 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-03-22 10:46:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created attachment 342700 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff]
> > fbgrab-zlib_h.patch
> 
> This patch is wrong? Why did you change the old one? zlib.h must be included
> before png.h. I will revert it tonight

I can't  apply the old patch, when i try do it i getting "No file to patch. Skipping patch" i don't know why. But new patch works fine by me.
Comment 5 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-22 10:49:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Created attachment 342700 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff]
> > > fbgrab-zlib_h.patch
> > 
> > This patch is wrong? Why did you change the old one? zlib.h must be included
> > before png.h. I will revert it tonight
> 
> I can't  apply the old patch, when i try do it i getting "No file to patch.
> Skipping patch" i don't know why. But new patch works fine by me.

I don't understand what this means to be honest. The same patch applies to both ebuilds since the source code is the same. Anyway the old patch needs to be restored anyway
Comment 6 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-03-22 10:59:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > > Created attachment 342700 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff]
> > > > fbgrab-zlib_h.patch
> > > 
> > > This patch is wrong? Why did you change the old one? zlib.h must be included
> > > before png.h. I will revert it tonight
> > 
> > I can't  apply the old patch, when i try do it i getting "No file to patch.
> > Skipping patch" i don't know why. But new patch works fine by me.
> 
> I don't understand what this means to be honest. The same patch applies to
> both ebuilds since the source code is the same. Anyway the old patch needs
> to be restored anyway

My bad,  patch works fine (checked by Pinkbyte). Please restore it.
Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-22 20:40:11 UTC
Patch restored