Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 461780 - net-misc/dahdi-2.6.2 version bump
Summary: net-misc/dahdi-2.6.2 version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Tony Vroon (RETIRED)
URL: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/tel...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-15 06:28 UTC by Oliver Jaksch
Modified: 2013-03-18 10:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
new ebuild (dahdi-2.6.2.ebuild,2.85 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-15 06:28 UTC, Oliver Jaksch
Details
updated patchset (gentoo-dahdi-patchset-1.1.4.tar.bz2,102.79 KB, application/octet-stream)
2013-03-15 06:29 UTC, Oliver Jaksch
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Oliver Jaksch 2013-03-15 06:28:18 UTC
Created attachment 342070 [details]
new ebuild

Digium released dahdi-2.6.2 with some bugfixes.
I removed 08-less-polarity-reversals.diff and 09-double-underscore-dev.diff as they're already included by Digium now.
Compiles fine.
Comment 1 Oliver Jaksch 2013-03-15 06:29:15 UTC
Created attachment 342072 [details]
updated patchset
Comment 2 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-18 09:40:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> I removed 08-less-polarity-reversals.diff

I agree with this:
phoenix dahdi-linux-2.6.2 # patch -p1 -i /usr/src/dahdi-patchset/08-less-polarity-reversals.diff 
patching file drivers/dahdi/wctdm24xxp/base.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] ^C

> and 09-double-underscore-dev.diff

But not with this:
phoenix dahdi-linux-2.6.2 # patch -p1 -i /usr/src/dahdi-patchset/09-double-underscore-dev.diff 
patching file include/dahdi/kernel.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 133 with fuzz 1 (offset 8 lines).

If you can convince me that 09 should not have applied I will redo the patchset as 1.1.5 as 1.1.4 had been uploaded before I read this bug in detail. My apologies.
Comment 3 Oliver Jaksch 2013-03-18 10:02:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)

> [...]
> If you can convince me that 09 should not have applied I will redo the
> patchset as 1.1.5 as 1.1.4 had been uploaded before I read this bug in
> detail. My apologies.

Yes, I *can* convince you :)  Have a look to the lines #123+ at the original source of dahdi-linux-2.6.2/include/dahdi/kernel.h - there's already this code.
The patch 09-double-underscore-dev.diff applys for sure but with the result that the code appears twice then. Unattractive IMHO...
Comment 4 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-18 10:13:01 UTC
+*dahdi-2.6.2 (18 Mar 2013)
+
+  18 Mar 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> +dahdi-2.6.2.ebuild:
+  Bugfix release; two of the downstream fixes have made it across. Patch
+  research & forward porting by Oliver Jaksch. Closes bug #461780.

Indeed, you have. Thanks Oliver :)
Comment 5 Oliver Jaksch 2013-03-18 10:32:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> +*dahdi-2.6.2 (18 Mar 2013)
> +
> +  18 Mar 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> +dahdi-2.6.2.ebuild:
> +  Bugfix release; two of the downstream fixes have made it across. Patch
> +  research & forward porting by Oliver Jaksch. Closes bug #461780.
> 
> Indeed, you have. Thanks Oliver :)

My pleasure! I'm doin' it again and yet again gladly :)